CVE-2019-12643
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco REST API virtual service container for Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication on the managed Cisco IOS XE device. The vulnerability is due to an improper check performed by the area of code that manages the REST API authentication service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting malicious HTTP requests to the targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain the token-id of an authenticated user. This token-id could be used to bypass authentication and execute privileged actions through the interface of the REST API virtual service container on the affected Cisco IOS XE device. The REST API interface is not enabled by default and must be installed and activated separately on IOS XE devices. See the Details section for more information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass authentication in the Cisco REST API virtual service container on IOS XE devices by submitting malicious HTTP requests that exploit an improper check in the authentication service code. Successful exploitation yields a valid token-id that can be used to execute privileged actions through the REST API interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 15.5\(3\)s3.16= 16.6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if REST API virtual service is enabledRun 'show virtual-service list' or check the configuration with 'show running-config | include rest' to see if the REST API virtual service is configured and activeAffected if REST API is enabled and running on the device
-
Confirm the IOS XE versionExecute 'show version' or 'show version | include IOS XE' to obtain the exact IOS XE software version numberAffected if The installed version matches or predates the affected releases (IOS XE 15.5(3)S3 through 15.5(3)S3.16 and IOS XE 16.6.5 and earlier)
-
Inspect REST API authentication behaviorIf REST API is enabled, review authentication logs or test unauthenticated REST API requests to verify whether the authentication check is properly enforced (do not exploit, only observe the response behavior)Affected if Unauthenticated HTTP requests to the REST API endpoint return valid token-ids instead of rejection
The environment is affected if the REST API virtual service is enabled and the IOS XE version falls within the affected version range, allowing authentication bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedIf the REST API is not required, leave it disabled. If needed, apply the Cisco patch/更新 for IOS XE and verify authentication behaves correctly post-update.
Cisco IOS XE 16.9.4 or later (or the latest available stable IOS XE release for your hardware platform)
- 1. Verify the REST API virtual service container is installed on the IOS XE device using 'show virtual-service list' or checking the configuration
- 2. If the REST API is not needed, ensure it remains disabled as a mitigation (it is not enabled by default)
- 3. If the REST API is required, upgrade the IOS XE software to a version that includes the fix for CVE-2019-12643
- 4. After upgrade, verify the REST API functionality works correctly with the new software version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-12643 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-12643 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data