Email Security Appliance FirmwareOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2019-12706

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-10-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 13.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) functionality of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured user filters on an affected device. The vulnerability exists because the affected software insufficiently validates certain incoming SPF messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a custom SPF packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured header filters, which could allow malicious content to pass through the device.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) AsyncOS software allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass configured header filters by sending specially crafted SPF packets. The flaw is in insufficient validation of incoming SPF messages, which can allow malicious content to pass through the device undetected.

MitigationApply the vendor patch from Cisco for AsyncOS software. Review and potentially augment header filters as a defense-in-depth measure while the patch is being deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Email Security Appliance FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 13.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device as Cisco ESA
    Confirm the device is a Cisco Email Security Appliance by checking the product model number in the hardware label or administrative interface
    Affected if The device is not a Cisco ESA - this CVE does not apply
  2. Check AsyncOS firmware version
    Access the ESA administrative web interface or CLI and navigate to System Administration > Software Upgrade or use the 'version' command in CLI to display the running AsyncOS version
    Affected if The installed AsyncOS firmware version is any version before 13.5.0 (e.g., 13.0.0, 12.5.x, etc.)
  3. Verify header filters are configured
    In the ESA web interface, go to Mail Policies > Inbound Message Filters or use the 'filters' CLI command to list configured header filters
    Affected if Header filters are actively configured and processing incoming messages - the bypass affects these filters
  4. Confirm SPF checking is enabled
    In the ESA web interface, go to Mail Policies > Sender Reputation Settings or Virtual Gateway settings and verify if SPF verification/checking is enabled for incoming messages
    Affected if SPF verification is enabled - the vulnerability allows specially crafted SPF packets to bypass header filters when SPF validation is active

The environment is affected if running Cisco ESA with AsyncOS firmware versions prior to 13.5.0 with header filters configured and SPF checking enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 13.5.0 or later
Fixed in 13.5.0
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor patch from Cisco for AsyncOS software. Review and potentially augment header filters as a defense-in-depth measure while the patch is being deployed.

Fix this in Email Security Appliance Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-12706 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-12706 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data