CVE-2019-12743
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHumHub Social Network Kit Enterprise v1.3.13 allows remote attackers to find the user accounts existing on any Social Network Kits (including self-hosted ones) by brute-forcing the username after the /u/ initial URI substring, aka Response Discrepancy Information Exposure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHumHub Social Network Kit Enterprise v1.3.13 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where the application returns different HTTP responses (status codes or body content) for valid versus invalid usernames when brute-forcing the /u/ URI path. This allows remote attackers to enumerate valid user accounts by observing response discrepancies.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.3.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm HumHub versionAccess the admin dashboard and navigate to Administration > Information, or check the file /protected/config/common.php for the version number, or view the footer of any HumHub page which often displays the version.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.3.13 (HumHub Social Network Kit Enterprise)
-
Identify if /u/ endpoint existsAttempt to access your HumHub installation at the URI /u/ followed by a known-valid username (e.g., /u/admin) and a random non-existent username (e.g., /u/thisuserdoesnotexist123).Affected if Both URLs return HTTP 200 but with visibly different page content or the valid username returns a user profile page while the invalid returns an error.
-
Compare HTTP status codesSend HTTP GET requests to /u/[valid_user] and /u/[invalid_user] and compare the response status codes using a tool like curl or browser developer tools.Affected if The valid username returns a different status code (e.g., 200) than the invalid username (e.g., 404 or 302 redirect), indicating the application confirms user existence.
-
Compare response body contentExamine the full HTML response bodies from both /u/ requests and look for differences in error messages, page titles, or whether a user profile is rendered.Affected if The response body differs significantly between valid and invalid usernames, allowing an attacker to programmatically distinguish valid accounts.
-
Check for rate limiting or CAPTCHA on /u/ pathReview the web server configuration (Apache/Nginx) and application-level rate limiting settings, or attempt multiple rapid requests to /u/ to see if requests are blocked or challenged.Affected if No rate limiting, CAPTCHA, or account lockout is enforced on the /u/ endpoint, meaning automated enumeration can proceed unhindered.
Your environment is affected if HumHub Social Network Kit Enterprise version 1.3.13 is installed AND the /u/ endpoint returns distinguishable responses between valid and invalid usernames, allowing an attacker to enumerate valid user accounts through automated requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement consistent HTTP responses for both valid and invalid usernames (generic error messages), combined with rate limiting or CAPTCHA after failed enumeration attempts to prevent automated username discovery.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-12743 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-12743 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data