CellsApplication · Pydio

CVE-2019-12902

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-06-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Pydio Cells before 1.5.0 does incomplete cleanup of a user's data upon deletion. This allows a new user, holding the same User ID as a deleted user, to restore the deleted user's data.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

In Pydio Cells before version 1.5.0, user data is not fully cleaned up when a user account is deleted. If a new user account is created with the same User ID as a previously deleted user (user ID recycling), that new user can restore or access the deleted user's data, resulting in unauthorized data disclosure and broken data isolation between users.

MitigationUpgrade to Pydio Cells version 1.5.0 or later, which implements complete data cleanup upon user deletion. For existing deployments, audit for any user ID reuse scenarios and run any provided data cleanup scripts for previously deleted users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CellsApplication
Affected:< 1.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Pydio Cells version
    Check the version of Pydio Cells currently running in your environment. This is typically visible in the admin dashboard under System Information, or can be obtained via the cells version command if you have CLI access.
    Affected if The installed version is any release prior to version 1.5.0 (for example, 1.4.x, 1.3.x, etc.)
  2. Identify user accounts with potential ID reuse
    Review your user directory to identify any scenarios where a new user account may have been created with a User ID (username or internal identifier) that previously belonged to a deleted account. This can be done by querying the user database or reviewing admin logs for user deletion and creation events.
    Affected if A new user exists whose User ID matches that of a previously deleted user, indicating user ID recycling has occurred.
  3. Inspect data storage for orphaned user data
    Examine the data storage backend (typically the cells-data or personal files directory) for folders or data objects belonging to deleted users that were not removed during the deletion process. Look for user-specific directories that persist after user deletion.
    Affected if Data directories or files belonging to previously deleted users still exist in the storage system.
  4. Verify data isolation between users
    Log in as a user who was created with a recycled User ID and attempt to access data. Check if that user can restore, view, or modify data that belonged to the previously deleted user with the same ID.
    Affected if The user can access data from the previously deleted account, demonstrating broken data isolation.

You are affected if running Pydio Cells version below 1.5.0 AND user ID recycling has occurred, allowing a new user to access a deleted user's data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.5.0 or later
Fixed in 1.5.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Pydio Cells version 1.5.0 or later, which implements complete data cleanup upon user deletion. For existing deployments, audit for any user ID reuse scenarios and run any provided data cleanup scripts for previously deleted users.

Fix this in Cells Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-12902 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-12902 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data