CVE-2019-13183
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFlarum before 0.1.0-beta.9 allows CSRF against all POST endpoints, as demonstrated by changing admin settings.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFlarum before version 0.1.0-beta.9 lacks proper Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection on POST endpoints. The application fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens, allowing attackers to craft malicious requests that trick authenticated users into performing unintended administrative actions such as modifying admin settings.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Flarum versionCheck the composer.json file in the Flarum root directory for the 'flarum/core' version entry, or look for a version file in the vendor directoryAffected if The installed version is 0.1.0 or any version earlier than 0.1.0-beta.9
-
Locate POST endpoint handling codeInspect the Flarum installation's vendor/flarum/core/src directory, specifically looking for Controller classes that handle POST requests in the admin areaAffected if The controllers do not contain code to validate an anti-CSRF token on POST requests
-
Verify CSRF token validation absenceSearch the codebase for 'csrf' or 'token' validation logic within POST request handlers in the admin controllersAffected if No anti-CSRF token validation routine is found in the admin POST endpoint handlers
-
Check admin session configurationExamine the session configuration file or the application's bootstrap files for any CSRF token handling setupAffected if No CSRF token generation, storage, or validation mechanism is configured for admin sessions
A user is affected if their Flarum installation is version 0.1.0 or earlier (prior to beta.9) and lacks CSRF token validation on admin POST endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to Flarum 0.1.0-beta.9 or later which implements proper CSRF token validation on all POST endpoints.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-13183 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-13183 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data