CVE-2019-13202
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSome Kyocera printers (such as the ECOSYS M5526cdw 2R7_2000.001.701) were affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability in the okhtmlfile and failhtmlfile parameters of several functionalities of the web application that would allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform a Denial of Service attack, crashing the device, or potentially execute arbitrary code on the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the okhtmlfile and failhtmlfile parameters of the web application in multiple Kyocera printer models (e.g., ECOSYS M5526cdw). An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted input to overflow buffers, potentially causing denial of service (device crash) or achieving arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2r7_2000.001.701CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Kyocera device modelAccess the printer web interface or check the device label/menu to confirm the exact model number (e.g., ECOSYS M5526cdw or other Kyocera multi-function printer models)Affected if The device is a Kyocera printer model that uses the vulnerable web application firmware
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the web interface (or printer control panel) and navigate to the firmware or system information section to view the current firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is exactly 2r7_2000.001.701 (the only version explicitly listed as affected in the provided data)
-
Confirm the web interface is enabledAttempt to access the printer web interface via HTTP/HTTPS on the device IP address, or check the web service status in the printer network settingsAffected if The web interface is accessible and enabled - this is the attack surface for the vulnerability
-
Verify network accessibility of the web serviceCheck if the printer IP is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet by reviewing firewall rules, network topology, or attempting external accessAffected if The web interface is reachable from untrusted network segments or the internet, allowing unauthenticated attackers to send malicious requests
You are affected only if you have a Kyocera ECOSYS M5526cdw (or compatible model) running firmware version 2r7_2000.001.701 with the web interface enabled and accessible to untrusted attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware updates when available; if no update exists, disable the web interface or place devices behind a firewall to restrict unauthorized access. Network segmentation is strongly recommended to limit exposure.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-13202 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-13202 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data