ReaderApplication · Foxitsoftware

CVE-2019-13327

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-10-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 9.6.0.25114 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of fields within Acroform objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8888.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723 contains a use-after-free or null pointer dereference vulnerability in Acroform field processing. The application fails to validate object existence before performing operations, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via malicious PDF files through user interaction.

MitigationUpdate Foxit Reader to the latest version; avoid opening untrusted PDF files or visiting malicious web pages until patched.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ReaderApplication
Affected:<= 9.6.0.25114

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Foxit Reader is installed
    Check the system for Foxit Reader installation by looking in standard installation directories (typically Program Files or Program Files (x86)) or use system utilities like 'Get-ItemProperty' on registry keys under HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall or WMIC product list
    Affected if Foxit Reader is present on the system
  2. Identify installed Foxit Reader version
    Right-click the Foxit Reader executable (foxitreader.exe) in the installation folder, select Properties, and view the Version tab. Alternatively, open Foxit Reader and go to Help > About Foxit Reader to display the exact version number
    Affected if Unable to determine version or version cannot be verified
  3. Compare version against affected range
    Compare your installed version number to the affected range: any version less than or equal to 9.6.0.25114 is vulnerable. Note that version 9.5.0.20723 is specifically listed as vulnerable in the CVE
    Affected if Installed version is 9.6.0.25114 or lower (any version <= 9.6.0.25114)
  4. Check for Acroform field usage
    The vulnerability affects Acroform field processing. Open any PDF file that contains AcroForm fields (forms with fillable fields) and verify Foxit Reader processes these fields. This can be confirmed by opening a PDF with form fields in Foxit Reader
    Affected if Acroform fields are present in PDFs opened with Foxit Reader and the application attempts to process them

If Foxit Reader is installed with a version number less than or equal to 9.6.0.25114 and processes PDF files containing AcroForm fields, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 9.6.0.25114
Interim mitigation

Update Foxit Reader to the latest version; avoid opening untrusted PDF files or visiting malicious web pages until patched.

Fix this in Reader Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-13327 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-13327 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data