CVE-2019-13485
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Xymon through 4.3.28, a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the history viewer component via a long hostname or service parameter to history.c.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow exists in Xymon's history viewer component (history.c). The vulnerability is triggered by providing an excessively long hostname or service parameter, which overflows a fixed-size buffer on the stack. This could allow remote attackers to achieve remote code execution given the critical CVSS score of 9.8.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0<= 4.3.28CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Xymon installation and versionRun 'xymond --version' or check the package version with 'dpkg -l | grep xymon' (Debian) or 'rpm -qa | grep xymon' (RPM-based). Also check for /usr/bin/xymon or /opt/xymon directories.Affected if The installed version is 4.3.28 or lower, or the package version is below 4.3.29
-
Locate the vulnerable history.c componentSearch for the history viewer binary or CGI script. Common paths include /usr/lib/xymon/cgi-bin/history.cgi, /opt/xymon/cgi-bin/history.cgi, or check the web root configured for Xymon.Affected if The history viewer CGI script exists in a publicly accessible web directory
-
Verify the history viewer is web-exposedCheck the web server configuration (Apache, nginx, or Xymon's built-in web server) for CGI or alias directives pointing to the history viewer. Look for entries like 'history.cgi' or 'history' in the web server config.Affected if The history viewer is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS without additional authentication barriers
-
Confirm Xymon web interface is runningCheck if Xymon's web server is listening on port 80 or 443. Use 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E "(80|443)"' or check the Xymon server status page at the configured URL.Affected if The Xymon web interface is running and the history viewer endpoint is reachable over the network
-
Check for installed patchesIf running a Debian package, verify the installed package with 'dpkg -l xymon' and compare the version string. For source installations, check if history.c contains the fix by reviewing the source code or changelog for references to CVE-2019-13485.Affected if No patch for CVE-2019-13485 has been applied, leaving the buffer overflow vulnerability unfixed
A user is affected if Xymon version 4.3.28 or lower is installed, the history viewer component is web-accessible, and no vendor patch for CVE-2019-13485 has been applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Xymon to version 4.3.29 or later which contains the fix. If patching is not immediately possible, restrict access to the history viewer component via network segmentation or authentication controls.
Xymon 4.3.30 or later (Debian 9+ or compile from source)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Xymon version using 'xymon --version' or checking the package manager
- 2. For Debian 8 (Jessie), check for available security updates via 'apt-get update' and 'apt-cache policy xymon'
- 3. If a fixed package is not available in Debian 8 repositories, consider upgrading to a newer Debian release or compiling Xymon from source
- 4. Download Xymon source from the official repository (github.com/xymon/xymon)
- 5. Compile and install version 4.3.30 or later which contains the security fix for this vulnerability
- 6. After upgrade, verify the version is greater than 4.3.28 using 'xymon --version'
- 7. Test the history viewer component with valid hostname/service parameters to confirm functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-13485 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-13485 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data