CVE-2019-14000
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLack of check that the RX FIFO write index that is read from shared RAM is less than the FIFO size results into memory corruption and potential information leakage in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, IPQ6018, IPQ8074, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCA8081, QCM2150, QCS404, QCS405, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SA6155P, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA bounds checking vulnerability exists in the RX FIFO handling logic of Snapdragon chipsets where the RX FIFO write index read from shared RAM is not validated against the FIFO size before use. This missing validation allows an attacker to access memory beyond allocated buffers, resulting in heap/stack memory corruption and potential information disclosure of sensitive data from adjacent memory regions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck /proc/cpuinfo, /sys/devices/system/cpu/, or use 'lshw' or 'cat /proc/device-tree/model' to identify the chipset. Alternatively, check boot logs with 'dmesg | grep -i qualcomm' or review /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/modelAffected if The chipset model matches one of the affected variants: Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8096, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Ipq6018, or Ipq8074
-
Determine the firmware versionCheck the baseband or system firmware version through vendor documentation, /proc/version, /sys/firmware/, or by contacting the device OEM. For some devices, 'cat /sys/class/net/*/device/firmware_version' or 'getprop ro.build.fingerprint' (Android) may reveal version stringsAffected if Any firmware version is installed on an affected chipset - the advisory lists 'all versions' as vulnerable
-
Confirm RX FIFO handling is in useIdentify if the device uses networking or serial interfaces that rely on the Snapdragon RX FIFO handling. Check for network interface drivers or check system logs for relevant hardware initialization. This is a hardware-level IP block, so confirm the Snapdragon SoC is actively processing network trafficAffected if The device actively uses the Snapdragon chipset for data reception (any network I/O through the Qualcomm IP)
If the device uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipset models (Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8096, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Ipq6018, Ipq8074) with any firmware version, it is potentially affected by this bounds check vulnerability in the RX FIFO handling logic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement a bounds check to verify the RX FIFO write index is less than the FIFO size before using it to access the FIFO, and deploy the firmware update through OEM channels.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14000 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14000 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data