CVE-2019-14020
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple Read overflows issue due to improper length check while decoding dedicated_eps_bearer_req/ act_def_context_req/ cs_serv_notification/ emm_info/ guti_realloc_cmd in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8053, APQ8076, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SC7180, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical read overflow vulnerability exists in Qualcomm Snapdragon baseband processors due to improper length validation when decoding multiple 3GPP NAS (Non-Access Stratum) protocol messages including dedicated_eps_bearer_req, act_def_context_req, cs_serv_notification, emm_info, and guti_realloc_cmd. The lack of bounds checking during message parsing allows memory reads beyond allocated buffers, potentially exposing sensitive data or facilitating code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use commands like 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Android, or check the baseband processor identification via AT commands (AT+CGMM or similar)Affected if The chipset is one of: Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Mdm9150, Mdm9205, or Mdm9206
-
Determine the baseband firmware versionQuery the modem firmware version via Android system info, or use AT command 'AT+CGMR' (may require root or manufacturer tools)Affected if The firmware version is any version - all versions of the listed chipsets are affected
-
Verify the device uses 3GPP NAS protocolConfirm the device connects to cellular networks using 3GPP standards (LTE/5G) - this is the default for most mobile devices; no specific config check neededAffected if The device supports and uses 3GPP cellular network protocols (most mobile devices)
-
Check for OEM security patchesReview the device's baseband/modem patch level in Android security patch settings (Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level) or contact the device manufacturerAffected if The security patch level is earlier than the vendor patch that addresses CVE-2019-14020 (specific dates vary by OEM)
The device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Mdm9150, Mdm9205, Mdm9206) and the baseband firmware has not been patched by the OEM.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataThis is a firmware-level vulnerability requiring patches from Qualcomm and subsequent OEM/device firmware updates. Organizations must identify affected devices, verify patch availability from device vendors, and apply available updates. No application-layer workarounds exist.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,008.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14020 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14020 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data