CVE-2019-14060
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUninitialized stack data gets used If memory is not allocated for blob or if the allocated blob is less than the struct size required due to lack of check of return value for read or write blob in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8098, IPQ4019, IPQ6018, IPQ8064, IPQ8074, MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCS405, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SA6155P, Saipan, SC8180X, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an uninitialized memory vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon firmware where read/write blob operations lack proper memory allocation checks and return value validation. When memory is either not allocated for a blob or is insufficiently allocated for the required struct size, uninitialized stack data gets used, potentially exposing sensitive information or causing unexpected behavior.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the chipset modelCheck the system hardware or bootloader information to determine the Qualcomm Snapdragon or IPQ chipset (e.g., Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8098, Ipq4019, Ipq6018, Ipq8064, Ipq8074)Affected if The chipset matches any of the affected models: Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8098, Ipq4019, Ipq6018, Ipq8064, or Ipq8074
-
Confirm firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version from the device (via bootloader, /proc/version, or vendor-specific interface) and verify it is a version for any of the affected chipsetsAffected if The device runs firmware built for any of the affected Qualcomm chipset models listed in the CVE
-
Identify blob read/write operationsInspect the firmware or application code that interfaces with the firmware to determine if blob read or write operations are performed (check for blob handling functions or data structure operations)Affected if The system performs blob read/write operations that interact with the affected firmware layer
-
Check for memory allocation validationReview the firmware or associated software stack to verify whether proper memory allocation checks and return value validation exist before blob operationsAffected if Memory allocation for blobs is not validated or insufficient buffer sizes are used before blob read/write operations, leading to uninitialized stack data exposure
A device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8098, Ipq4019, Ipq6018, Ipq8064, Ipq8074) and performs blob read/write operations without proper memory allocation validation, as the firmware lacks these checks across all versions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper memory allocation validation and return value checking before blob read/write operations. Ensure the allocated blob buffer is sufficient for the required struct size, and validate all return values from memory allocation and I/O functions.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14060 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14060 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data