CVE-2019-14073
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCopying RTCP messages into the output buffer without checking the destination buffer size which could lead to a remote stack overflow when processing large data or non-standard feedback messages in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8076, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, Kamorta, MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SA415M, SC7180, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack overflow vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon processors where RTCP messages are copied into the output buffer without bounds checking, allowing remote attackers to overflow the stack when processing large or non-standard RTCP feedback messages. This enables potential remote code execution at the processor level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the chipset modelCheck device specifications via system info apps, boot logs, or on Android use `cat /proc/cpuinfo` to find the processor identifier. Look for model numbers such as Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, Apq8098, or Kamorta.Affected if The chipset matches any of the following: Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, Apq8098, or Kamorta.
-
Check the baseband or firmware versionOn Android, go to Settings > About Phone > Baseband version or use `at+Ver` or `AT+GMR` via a terminal app with modem AT command access. Alternatively, check the device boot log or firmware information from the OEM.Affected if The device runs any firmware version on the affected chipsets listed, as all versions of these firmwares are vulnerable.
-
Determine if RTCP traffic is processedMonitor network traffic on the device for RTCP (Real-time Transport Control Protocol) packets, typically on UDP ports 5004-5005, or check if VoIP, video conferencing, or streaming applications that use RTP/RTCP are active on the device.Affected if The device actively processes incoming or outgoing RTCP messages as part of RTP-based communication sessions.
The device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset models (Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Kamorta) and processes RTCP traffic, since all firmware versions of these chipsets contain the unbounded copy vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply firmware updates from device manufacturers that include the Qualcomm patch for CVE-2019-14073. Since this is a processor-level vulnerability in Snapdragon chipsets, no application-level remediation is possible; end-users must obtain updated firmware from their device/OEM vendors.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14073 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14073 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data