CVE-2019-14075
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNull pointer dereference issue in radio interface layer due to lack of null check in sapmodule destructor in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in MDM9607, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCS605, Rennell, Saipan, SDM450, SDM630, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR2130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA null pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the radio interface layer (RIL) of Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. The issue is in the sapmodule destructor, which lacks proper null checking before dereferencing a pointer. This causes a kernel or system crash when the destructor executes with a null pointer, leading to denial of service. The vulnerability affects 23 different Snapdragon chipset variants across mobile, automotive, consumer IoT, and industrial IoT platforms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the chipset modelCheck the device or system's processor/chipset information. On Android, this may be found in /proc/cpuinfo or through settings. For other systems, check BIOS/UEFI or system information utilities. Look for model numbers: Mdm9607, Msm8917, Msm8920, Msm8937, Msm8940, Msm8953, Msm8998, or Nicobar.Affected if The chipset matches any of the listed affected models (Mdm9607, Msm8917, Msm8920, Msm8937, Msm8940, Msm8953, Msm8998, or Nicobar)
-
Verify the chipset is a Qualcomm SnapdragonConfirm the identified chipset belongs to the Qualcomm Snapdragon product line. These are ARM-based processors commonly found in mobile devices, automotive systems, IoT devices, and industrial equipment.Affected if The chipset is confirmed to be a Qualcomm Snapdragon variant matching the affected models
-
Check baseband/radio firmware versionAccess the baseband or radio firmware version information. On Android devices, this is typically found in Settings > About Phone > Baseband version, or via AT commands (such as AT+CGMR or ATI) through a terminal emulator. For embedded systems, consult manufacturer documentation for firmware version retrieval.Affected if The baseband firmware version can be retrieved (all versions of the listed chipsets are affected per the advisory)
-
Identify RIL and sapmodule usageCheck if the Radio Interface Layer (RIL) and SAP (Serial Audio Protocol) module are active on the system. On Android, examine /system/lib/libreference-ril.so or similar RIL libraries. Review system logs (logcat) for sapmodule or RIL-related processes and functionality.Affected if The system utilizes a RIL implementation with sapmodule functionality, as the vulnerability exists in the sapmodule destructor
If the device uses any of the affected Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset models (Mdm9607, Msm8917, Msm8920, Msm8937, Msm8940, Msm8953, Msm8998, or Nicobar) and utilizes the Radio Interface Layer with sapmodule, the environment is considered affected since all firmware versions of these chipsets contain the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware/security updates from the device OEM that include the patched radio interface layer. Since this is a baseband/radio firmware issue, users must obtain updates from their device manufacturer rather than through traditional OS patches.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,856.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14075 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14075 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data