CVE-2019-14089
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedu'Keymaster attestation key and device IDs provisioning which is a one time process is incorrectly allowed to be re-provisioned after a user data erase or a factory reset' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in Kamorta, Nicobar, QCS404, QCS610, Rennell, SA515M, SA6155P, SC7180, SC8180X, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR2130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Keymaster attestation key and device ID provisioning, which is designed to be a one-time operation during manufacturing, can be incorrectly re-provisioned after a user data erase or factory reset. This allows the same attestation keys to be regenerated, breaking the guarantee that these keys uniquely identify a specific device and undermining hardware attestation security.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm firmware variantCheck the device system information or /proc/cpuinfo to determine the specific Qualcomm chip model (Kamorta, Nicobar, Qcs404, Qcs610, Rennell, Sa515m, Sa6155p, or Sc7180)Affected if The device uses any of the listed firmware variants (Kamorta, Nicobar, Qcs404, Qcs610, Rennell, Sa515m, Sa6155p, or Sc7180)
-
Check if factory reset has been performedDetermine whether the device has undergone a user data erase or factory reset since initial provisioningAffected if A factory reset has been performed on the device
-
Verify attestation key uniqueness after resetCompare the Keymaster attestation certificate or device ID (such as the uniqueAttestationId or device ID) before and after a factory reset to see if they remain the same or changeAffected if The attestation keys or device ID change after a factory reset, indicating they were regenerated rather than being unique per device
-
Inspect Keymaster provisioning stateUse Keymaster debug or diagnostic tools (if available) to query whether attestation keys have been provisioned more than once, checking for duplicate or re-provisioned key entriesAffected if The Keymaster shows attestation keys were provisioned after a factory reset when they should have been set only once during manufacturing
-
Check for multiple identical attestation certificatesExtract and compare attestation certificates from multiple factory reset cycles on the same device to see if identical certificates are producedAffected if Identical attestation certificates appear after separate factory resets, confirming the vulnerability exists on that device
The device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm firmware variants (Kamorta, Nicobar, Qcs404, Qcs610, Rennell, Sa515m, Sa6155p, or Sc7180) and attestation keys can be regenerated after a factory reset.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Qualcomm firmware patch (distributed via device OEM/ODM) to ensure Keymaster rejects re-provisioning attempts after factory reset. Until patched, be aware that device identity attestation may not be trustworthy on affected devices.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,280.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14089 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14089 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data