CVE-2019-14300
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSeveral Ricoh printers have multiple buffer overflows parsing HTTP cookie headers, which allow an attacker to cause a denial of service or code execution via crafted requests to the web server. Affected firmware versions depend on the printer models. One affected configuration is cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c250dn_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* up to (including) 1.06 running on cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c250dn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c252dn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. Another affected configuration is cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c250sf_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* up to (including) 1.12 running on cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c250sf:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c252sf:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the web server component of several Ricoh printer models (SP C250DN, SP C252DN, SP C250SF, SP C252SF) when parsing HTTP cookie headers. Crafted requests containing oversized or malformed cookie data can trigger heap or stack-based overflows, enabling denial of service or potentially remote code execution with the privileges of the web server process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.13< 1.13< 1.07< 1.07CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the printer modelAccess the printer's web interface or control panel to confirm the exact model number (SP C250DN, SP C252DN, SP C250SF, or SP C252SF). If unknown, check the device label or printed test page.Affected if The model is not one of the four affected models listed in the CVE.
-
Determine the installed firmware versionLog in to the printer web interface and navigate to the Device Information or Firmware version page. Alternatively, print a configuration page from the control panel to view the firmware version.Affected if The firmware version is below 1.07 for C250DN/C252DN models, or below 1.13 for C250SF/C252SF models.
-
Verify the web server component is enabledConfirm that the embedded web server (Web Image Monitor or similar) is accessible by attempting to reach the printer IP address on HTTP/HTTPS ports (typically 80 or 443). Check printer network settings to ensure the web service is turned on.Affected if The web server component is disabled or inaccessible, as the vulnerability exists within this component when parsing HTTP cookie headers.
-
Assess network exposure of the web interfaceReview network configuration, firewall rules, or VLAN assignment to determine if the printer web interface is reachable from untrusted network segments or the internet.Affected if The web interface is exposed to untrusted users or networks, increasing the likelihood of exploitation attempts.
You are affected if you own an SP C250DN, SP C252DN, SP C250SF, or SP C252SF printer with firmware below 1.07 (DN models) or 1.13 (SF models) and the web server component is enabled and network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.071.13
Update printer firmware to versions beyond 1.06 (for C250DN/C252DN) and 1.12 (for C250SF/C252SF). Additionally, restrict network access to the printer web interface using firewall rules or network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted attackers.
Sp C250sf/Sp C252sf: firmware 1.13 | Sp C250dn/Sp C252dn: firmware 1.07
- Identify the exact Ricoh printer model (Sp C250sf, Sp C252sf, Sp C250dn, or Sp C252dn)
- Access the printer's web management interface or control panel to check the current firmware version
- Download the latest firmware from Ricoh's official support website (www.ricoh.com or www.ricoh-usa.com)
- Follow Ricoh's standard firmware update procedure - typically via the web interface under 'Administrator' > 'Firmware Update' or using Ricoh's firmware update utility
- After updating, verify the firmware version has been changed to the fixed release: 1.13 or higher for Sp C250sf/Sp C252sf, or 1.07 or higher for Sp C250dn/Sp C252dn
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14300 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14300 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data