InspectorApplication · Zingbox

CVE-2019-15016

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-10-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.288 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An SQL injection vulnerability exists in the management interface of Zingbox Inspector versions 1.288 and earlier, that allows for unsanitized data provided by an authenticated user to be passed from the web UI into the database.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in Zingbox Inspector management interface (versions 1.288 and earlier) allows authenticated users to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input fields in the web UI, which are directly executed against the backend database.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Zingbox Inspector; if no patch is available, disable or restrict access to the management interface until a fix can be applied, and audit all input handling in the web UI for proper parameterization.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
InspectorApplication
Affected:<= 1.288

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Zingbox Inspector installation
    Locate the Zingbox Inspector application on the system. Check for processes named 'zingbox', 'inspector', or related services. Look for installation directories typically under /opt/zingbox or similar paths.
    Affected if Zingbox Inspector software is present on the system
  2. Determine installed version
    Check the installed version of Zingbox Inspector. This is typically found in the application itself, often accessible through the management UI help/about page, or via command line tools provided with the software such as 'zingbox --version' or inspecting version files in the installation directory.
    Affected if The version number is 1.288 or lower
  3. Verify management interface accessibility
    Determine if the Zingbox Inspector management web interface is accessible on the network. Check for listening ports (typically 443, 8443, or configured HTTP/HTTPS ports). Review firewall rules and network configurations to identify exposure.
    Affected if The management interface is accessible from network segments beyond the intended administrative scope
  4. Confirm authentication is required
    Review the Zingbox Inspector configuration to verify that authentication is enforced for the management interface access. Check that default or weak credentials are not in use and that proper authentication mechanisms are enabled.
    Affected if The management interface allows unauthenticated access or uses default credentials
  5. Inspect web UI input fields
    Examine the web management interface for input fields that may not properly sanitize user input. Review any available logs for SQL error messages or unusual database query patterns that could indicate SQL injection testing.
    Affected if Input fields in the management UI accept unsanitized input and SQL errors appear in logs

The environment is affected if Zingbox Inspector version 1.288 or earlier is installed and its management interface is accessible with authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.288
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Zingbox Inspector; if no patch is available, disable or restrict access to the management interface until a fix can be applied, and audit all input handling in the web UI for proper parameterization.

Fix this in Inspector Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-15016 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-15016 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data