Mail2000Application · Openfind

CVE-2019-15073

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-11-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.0 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Open Redirect vulnerability for all browsers in MAIL2000 through version 6.0 and 7.0, which will redirect to a malicious site without authentication. This vulnerability affects many mail system of governments, organizations, companies and universities.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

An Open Redirect vulnerability in MAIL2000 mail software versions 6.0 and 7.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to craft malicious URLs that redirect users to arbitrary external websites. This affects the webmail interface and occurs due to insufficient validation of redirect parameters.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of MAIL2000 if available, or implement strict URL validation/allowlist filtering on redirect parameters to prevent external domain redirection. Consider deploying a WAF rule to block suspicious redirect patterns.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mail2000Application
Affected:>= 6.0, <= 7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Mail2000 version
    Locate the installed version of Openfind Mail2000 by checking software inventory, vendor documentation, or system configuration files. Compare the version number to the affected range: 6.0 through 7.0.
    Affected if The installed version falls between 6.0 and 7.0 inclusive.
  2. Confirm webmail interface exposure
    Determine whether the Mail2000 webmail interface is network-accessible by reviewing firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, and external access policies.
    Affected if The webmail interface is accessible to users over the network.
  3. Locate redirect parameters in webmail URLs
    Analyze webmail-generated URLs during login, logout, and link navigation to identify parameters that control page redirection (commonly named 'redirect', 'url', 'next', or similar).
    Affected if The webmail uses redirect parameters to direct users to different pages.
  4. Test redirect parameter for external domain acceptance
    Construct a test URL using the redirect parameter with an external domain (such as ?redirect=http://example.com) and verify if the application permits redirection to that external site without blocking or validating the target.
    Affected if The application allows redirection to arbitrary external domains without restriction.
  5. Inspect URL validation controls
    Review any existing URL validation logic, allowlist filtering, or WAF configurations that may already mitigate this vulnerability in the deployment.
    Affected if No URL validation or allowlist filtering is implemented on redirect parameters.

The environment is affected if Mail2000 versions 6.0-7.0 are deployed with an accessible webmail interface that permits unrestricted external redirects through URL parameters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of MAIL2000 if available, or implement strict URL validation/allowlist filtering on redirect parameters to prevent external domain redirection. Consider deploying a WAF rule to block suspicious redirect patterns.

Fix this in Mail2000 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-15073 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-15073 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data