Spa112 FirmwareOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2019-15245

HIGH · 8.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-10-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.4.1 or later.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco SPA100 Series Analog Telephone Adapters (ATAs) could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input to the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by authenticating to the web-based management interface and sending crafted requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. Note: The web-based management interface is enabled by default.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco SPA100 Series ATAs allow authenticated, adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. The attack requires authentication to the web interface (enabled by default) and adjacent network access.

MitigationDisable the web-based management interface if not required, restrict network access to the management interface via ACLs, enforce strong authentication credentials, and apply vendor firmware updates when available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Spa112 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 1.4.1= 1.4.1
Spa122 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 1.4.1= 1.4.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Access the web-based management interface of the ATA and navigate to the System or Admin page to confirm the device is a Cisco Spa112 or Spa122. The model is displayed on the device status or summary page.
    Affected if The device is a Cisco Spa112 or Spa122 ATA.
  2. Check the firmware version
    In the web interface, locate the firmware version information (usually under System > General or Device Information). Compare the installed version string to 1.4.1.
    Affected if The firmware version is lower than 1.4.1 (for example, 1.3.x, 1.2.x) or exactly 1.4.1.
  3. Verify the web management interface is enabled
    In the web interface, go to Web Server settings or Administration > Web Access and confirm whether the web-based management interface is enabled.
    Affected if The web-based management interface is enabled (this is the default setting).
  4. Assess network accessibility of the web interface
    From a host on the adjacent network, attempt to reach the ATA web interface IP address on HTTP (port 80) or HTTPS (port 443). Check if ACLs or firewall rules permit unrestricted access.
    Affected if The web interface is reachable from an adjacent network segment without proper access controls.

A user is affected if the device is a Cisco Spa112 or Spa122 running firmware version 1.4.1 or below, and the web-based management interface is enabled and accessible from the adjacent network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.4.1 or later
Fixed in 1.4.1
Interim mitigation

Disable the web-based management interface if not required, restrict network access to the management interface via ACLs, enforce strong authentication credentials, and apply vendor firmware updates when available.

Fix this in Spa112 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-15245 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-15245 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data