Pan OsOperating system · Paloaltonetworks

CVE-2019-1580

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-08-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 9.0.3 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Memory corruption in PAN-OS 7.1.24 and earlier, PAN-OS 8.0.19 and earlier, PAN-OS 8.1.9 and earlier, and PAN-OS 9.0.3 and earlier will allow a remote, unauthenticated user to craft a message to Secure Shell Daemon (SSHD) and corrupt arbitrary memory.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Memory corruption vulnerability in PAN-OS Secure Shell Daemon (SSHD) affecting versions 7.1.24 and earlier, 8.0.19 and earlier, 8.1.9 and earlier, and 9.0.3 and earlier. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted messages to corrupt arbitrary memory, potentially leading to code execution.

MitigationUpgrade PAN-OS to a version newer than the affected versions (7.1.25+, 8.0.20+, 8.1.10+, or 9.0.4+) to patch the memory corruption vulnerability in SSHD.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pan OsOperating system
Affected:<= 7.1.24>= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.19>= 8.1.0, <= 8.1.9>= 9.0.0, <= 9.0.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify PAN-OS version
    Run 'show system info' from the PAN-OS CLI or check the System Information page in the web management interface
    Affected if The installed version is 7.1.24 or earlier, 8.0.19 or earlier, 8.1.9 or earlier, or 9.0.3 or earlier
  2. Confirm SSH daemon is enabled
    Run 'show system services' from the CLI or check the Device > Setup > Management > Management Interface Settings in the web UI to verify SSH service is enabled
    Affected if SSH (SSHD) is enabled on any interface (management or data plane)
  3. Check SSH access from untrusted networks
    Review the interface bindings and security zone assignments for SSH access. Use 'show interface' and check which zones the management or data plane interfaces with SSH are assigned to
    Affected if SSH is accessible from untrusted zones, external interfaces, or the internet (not just from trusted management networks)

A user is affected if their PAN-OS version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND SSH daemon is enabled and accessible from a network where unauthenticated attackers could reach it.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 9.0.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade PAN-OS to a version newer than the affected versions (7.1.25+, 8.0.20+, 8.1.10+, or 9.0.4+) to patch the memory corruption vulnerability in SSHD.

Recommended fix High confidence

PAN-OS 7.1.25+ (or migrate to 8.1+), 8.0.20+, 8.1.10+, or 9.0.4+ (recommended: latest 9.1.x or 10.x for longest support)

  1. 1. Identify the current PAN-OS version by navigating to Device > Summary in the web interface or running 'show system info' in CLI
  2. 2. Determine which branch (7.1, 8.0, 8.1, or 9.0) is currently running
  3. 3. For PAN-OS 7.1.x: Upgrade to PAN-OS 7.1.25 or later (note: 7.1 branch may be end-of-life; consider migrating to a supported branch)
  4. 4. For PAN-OS 8.0.x: Upgrade to PAN-OS 8.0.20 or later
  5. 5. For PAN-OS 8.1.x: Upgrade to PAN-OS 8.1.10 or later
  6. 6. For PAN-OS 9.0.x: Upgrade to PAN-OS 9.0.4 or later
  7. 7. Download the appropriate PAN-OS update from Palo Alto Networks support portal
  8. 8. Upload and install the update via Device > Software or via CLI with 'request system software install'
Caveat Upgrading PAN-OS may introduce behavioral changes; test thoroughly in non-production environment first. The 7.1 branch is end-of-life; consider migrating to a supported branch (8.1+, 9.0+, or 10.x) for continued security updates.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Pan Os Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1580 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data