CVE-2019-15845
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRuby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 mishandles path checking within File.fnmatch functions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceRuby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.6.4 contains a path checking vulnerability in the File.fnmatch and File.fnmatch? functions. The functions mishandle certain path patterns, potentially allowing security controls to be bypassed when matching file paths against patterns.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.4.0, <= 2.4.7>= 2.5.0, <= 2.5.6>= 2.6.0, <= 2.6.4= 16.04= 18.04= 19.04= 19.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Ruby versionRun `ruby --version` or `ruby -v` from the command line to get the exact version numberAffected if The version falls within 2.4.0-2.4.7, 2.5.0-2.5.6, or 2.6.0-2.6.4
-
Check if File.fnmatch is used in application codeSearch source files for occurrences of `File.fnmatch` or `File.fnmatch?` using grep or a similar search tool across the codebaseAffected if The application code contains calls to File.fnmatch or File.fnmatch? for path validation or pattern matching
-
Review fnmatch pattern arguments for vulnerability triggersExamine the patterns passed to File.fnmatch to identify if they could be exploited with crafted path inputs (e.g., patterns that should not match escaped or specially crafted paths)Affected if The fnmatch patterns are used for security-critical path validation without additional input sanitization
You are affected if your installed Ruby version is 2.4.0-2.4.7, 2.5.0-2.5.6, or 2.6.0-2.6.4 and your application uses File.fnmatch or File.fnmatch? for path security checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Ruby to version 2.4.8+, 2.5.7+, or 2.6.5+ respectively, or later stable releases. Review applications using File.fnmatch to ensure proper input validation is in place as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-15845 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-15845 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data