CVE-2019-16001
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the loading mechanism of specific dynamic link libraries in Cisco Webex Teams for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a DLL hijacking attack. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have valid credentials on the Windows system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of the resources loaded by the application at run time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious DLL file and placing it in a specific location on the targeted system. The malicious DLL file would execute when the vulnerable application is launched. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target machine with the privileges of another user account.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a DLL hijacking vulnerability in Cisco Webex Teams for Windows where the application insufficiently validates dynamic link libraries loaded at runtime. An authenticated local attacker can place a malicious DLL in a specific location on the target system, which the application will load and execute when launched, allowing arbitrary code execution with the privileges of another user account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco Webex is installedOpen Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersion, InstallLocation' in PowerShell to list installed programs. Look for 'Cisco Webex Teams' or 'Cisco Webex Meetings'.Affected if Either Cisco Webex Teams or Cisco Webex Meetings appears in the installed programs list.
-
Locate the Webex installation directoryIf installed, note the InstallLocation path from the previous step, or right-click the Webex shortcut, select Properties, and check the 'Start in' field to find the executable path.Affected if An installation directory exists for Cisco Webex.
-
Inspect the Webex installation directory for unexpected DLL filesNavigate to the installation directory identified in step 2. Look for any .dll files that are not part of the standard Webex distribution or appear out of place (e.g., newly created, unusual names, unexpected DLLs in the main folder). Use 'dir *.dll' to list all DLLs.Affected if Any untrusted or unexpected DLL files are present in the installation directory.
-
Check for DLLs in user-writable directories accessible to other usersExamine common DLL hijacking locations such as the user's TEMP folder (%TEMP%), the current working directory where Webex is launched from, or any shared folder accessible by other authenticated users. Run 'dir /s /b *.dll' in these locations to find DLLs.Affected if Suspicious DLL files exist in locations where an authenticated attacker could place a file and where Webex might load them.
-
Verify the installed Webex version against affected rangesIn Programs and Features, note the exact version displayed for Cisco Webex Teams or Cisco Webex Meetings. According to the advisory, all versions of both products are affected.Affected if Any version of Cisco Webex Teams or Cisco Webex Meetings is installed.
A system is affected if Cisco Webex Teams or Cisco Webex Meetings is installed, regardless of version, and an untrusted DLL exists in any location where the application searches for libraries at runtime.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement secure DLL loading by using full absolute paths for all DLL dependencies, validating DLL signatures/cryptographic hashes before loading, and using safe library search order configurations (e.g., SetDllDirectory with empty string to remove current directory from search path).
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-16001 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-16001 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data