Vision Dynamic Signage DirectorApplication · Cisco

CVE-2019-16004

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-09-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the REST API endpoint of Cisco Vision Dynamic Signage Director could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to missing authentication on some of the API calls. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a request to one of the affected calls. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to interact with some parts of the API.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cisco Vision Dynamic Signage Director REST API has missing authentication checks on certain API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass authentication and interact with some parts of the API that should require credentials.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for CVE-2019-16004 when available and restrict network access to the REST API endpoints to trusted sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Vision Dynamic Signage DirectorApplication
Affected:< 6.2.0= 6.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Cisco Vision Dynamic Signage Director version
    Access the administration interface or check the system documentation for the software version information. Look for a version number displayed in the product about page, CLI show version command, or version file in the installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is less than 6.2.0 or exactly equals 6.2.0
  2. Confirm REST API accessibility
    Check network configuration to determine if the REST API ports (typically TCP 443 for HTTPS or TCP 80 for HTTP) are open and reachable from untrusted networks. Use tools like netstat, nmap, or review firewall rules.
    Affected if The REST API is exposed to untrusted network segments or the internet
  3. Verify authentication requirement on API endpoints
    Attempt to access common REST API endpoints such as /api/v1/ or /vision/ without providing any authentication credentials. Use curl or a similar tool to send a request without Authorization headers or session cookies.
    Affected if The API responds with successful data or status 200 instead of redirecting to a login page or returning 401/403 authentication errors
  4. Test specific affected endpoints for authentication bypass
    Send unauthenticated requests to known API endpoints that should require credentials, such as those handling user data, content management, or system configuration. Compare the responses to authenticated requests.
    Affected if Unauthenticated requests successfully retrieve sensitive information or perform actions that should require authentication

You are affected if your installed version is less than 6.2.0 or exactly 6.2.0 AND the REST API is accessible from a network where untrusted attackers could send requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.2.0 or later
Fixed in 6.2.0
Interim mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for CVE-2019-16004 when available and restrict network access to the REST API endpoints to trusted sources.

Fix this in Vision Dynamic Signage Director Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-16004 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-16004 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data