CVE-2019-16019
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the implementation of Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Ethernet VPN (EVPN) functionality in Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerabilities are due to incorrect processing of BGP update messages that contain crafted EVPN attributes. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending BGP EVPN update messages with malformed attributes to be processed by an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the BGP process to restart unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. The Cisco implementation of BGP accepts incoming BGP traffic only from explicitly defined peers. To exploit these vulnerabilities, the malicious BGP update message would need to come from a configured, valid BGP peer, or would need to be injected by the attacker into the victim's BGP network on an existing, valid TCP connection to a BGP peer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in Cisco IOS XR Software's BGP EVPN implementation where incorrect processing of BGP update messages containing malformed EVPN attributes can trigger an unexpected restart of the BGP process. An attacker needs to send malicious BGP EVPN messages either from a configured, valid BGP peer or by injecting them into an existing TCP connection to a BGP peer, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.6.1= 6.6.2= 6.6.25= 7.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the Cisco IOS XR software versionExecute 'show version' on the IOS XR device and locate the version number in the outputAffected if The installed version is 6.6.1, 6.6.2, 6.6.25, or 7.0.1 exactly matching one of the affected releases
-
Confirm BGP is running on the deviceRun 'show bgp summary' or 'show processes bgp' to verify the BGP process is activeAffected if BGP process is running and configured on the device
-
Verify EVPN address family is enabled under BGPExecute 'show bgp l2vpn evpn summary' or examine the BGP configuration for EVPN (L2VPN EVPN) address family entriesAffected if The EVPN address family is enabled under BGP configuration
-
Identify configured BGP EVPN peersUse 'show bgp l2vpn evpn neighbors' or review BGP configuration for any peer definitions that include EVPN capabilityAffected if There are configured BGP peers with EVPN address family capability
-
Check for BGP process instability or recent restartsReview system logs, use 'show log' or 'show bgp crash-files' to identify any recent BGP process crashes or unexpected restartsAffected if BGP process has experienced unexpected restarts or crashes, which may indicate exploitation attempts
The device is affected if it runs Cisco IOS XR version 6.6.1, 6.6.2, 6.6.25, or 7.0.1 with BGP EVPN configured and has active peers capable of sending EVPN update messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco IOS XR software update addressing CVE-2019-16019. Additionally, implement BGP route validation and peer authentication (MD5, TCP AO) to protect against malicious peer injection, and monitor for anomalous BGP EVPN messages.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-16019 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-16019 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data