CVE-2019-1631
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access potentially sensitive system usage information. The vulnerability is due to a lack of proper data protection mechanisms. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view sensitive system data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco IMC web-based management interface allows unauthenticated remote attackers to access sensitive system usage information via crafted HTTP requests. The root cause is insufficient data protection mechanisms in the web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 4.0\(1c\)hs3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco IMC installationAccess the system's management interface CLI or check firmware version using `show version` or `ipmitool -I lanplus -H <imc_ip> -U admin -P <password> raw` commands to retrieve version informationAffected if The system is running Cisco Integrated Management Controller (any version)
-
Identify Cisco UCS versionCheck the Cisco Unified Computing System version via IMC interface or CLI using `show version` or through the UCS Manager if availableAffected if The UCS version is exactly 4.0(1c)hs3
-
Verify web-based management interface is enabledCheck IMC configuration for web interface status via CLI: `scope ipmi` then `show detail` or via IMC web UI under 'Server' > 'Summary' > 'Management Interfaces'Affected if The Cisco IMC web-based management interface is enabled and accessible
-
Confirm web interface network exposureReview network access controls, firewall rules, or ACLs protecting the IMC web interface (typically ports 80/443 or 4433). Use `show network` or `show ipmi access` from IMC CLIAffected if The IMC web interface is reachable from untrusted networks (not restricted to trusted IPs)
Your environment is affected if you run Cisco IMC (any version) or UCS version 4.0(1c)hs3 with the web-based management interface enabled and exposed to untrusted network access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Cisco firmware/software update for Cisco IMC that addresses this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the management interface to trusted IPs only.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1631 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1631 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data