CVE-2019-1653
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information. The vulnerability is due to improper access controls for URLs. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to an affected device via HTTP or HTTPS and requesting specific URLs. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to download the router configuration or detailed diagnostic information. Cisco has released firmware updates that address this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Cisco RV320 and RV325 routers contain an information disclosure vulnerability in their web-based management interface. Improper access controls on specific URLs allow unauthenticated remote attackers to download the router configuration file and detailed diagnostic information by sending HTTP or HTTPS requests to the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.4.2.15= 1.4.2.17= 1.4.2.15= 1.4.2.17CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to Administration > Firmware Upgrade, or use the CLI command 'show version' via SSH/Telnet to retrieve the installed firmware versionAffected if The firmware version displayed is 1.4.2.15 or 1.4.2.17
-
Verify remote management is enabledIn the web interface, go to VPN > Remote Management or Administration > Remote Management to check if HTTP or HTTPS remote access is enabled for external interfacesAffected if Remote management via HTTP or HTTPS is enabled on any WAN-facing interface
-
Determine if the device is internet-facingCheck your network firewall or NAT rules to see if TCP ports 80 (HTTP) or 443 (HTTPS) are forwarded to the router's WAN IP, or attempt to access the router's public IP from an external networkAffected if The router's management interface is reachable from untrusted networks or the public internet
-
Confirm the device modelCheck the router label or web interface (typically at the top of the status page) to confirm the exact model is RV320 or RV325Affected if The device is a Cisco RV320 or RV325 router running the affected firmware versions
A user is affected if they are running Cisco RV320 or RV325 firmware version 1.4.2.15 or 1.4.2.17 with remote management enabled and accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor firmware update released by Cisco to address this vulnerability. If patching is not immediately possible, restrict access to the management interface to trusted networks or disable remote management if not required.
Upgrade to the latest available firmware version for Cisco RV320/RV325 (version higher than 1.4.2.17) from Cisco's official support website
- 1. Identify the exact model (RV320 or RV325) of the Cisco Small Business router in your environment.
- 2. Access the Cisco support website (www.cisco.com) and navigate to the product pages for RV320 or RV325 routers.
- 3. Locate and download the latest available firmware version for your specific model. The fixed version will be greater than 1.4.2.17.
- 4. Access the router's web-based management interface.
- 5. Navigate to the Administration or System Management section.
- 6. Locate the firmware upgrade option and upload the downloaded firmware file.
- 7. Wait for the upgrade process to complete and the router to reboot.
- 8. After reboot, verify the firmware version in the management interface to confirm the upgrade was successful.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1653 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- packetstormsecurity.com
- tools.cisco.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- badpackets.net
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- threatpost.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.youtube.com
- www.zdnet.com
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1653 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data