EshopApplication · Oxid Esales

CVE-2019-17062

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-11-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.0.6 / 6.1.5 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in OXID eShop 6.x before 6.0.6 and 6.1.x before 6.1.5, OXID eShop Enterprise Edition Version 5.2.x-5.3.x, OXID eShop Professional Edition Version 4.9.x-4.10.x and OXID eShop Community Edition Version: 4.9.x-4.10.x. By using a specially crafted URL, users with administrative rights could unintentionally grant unauthorized users access to the admin panel via session fixation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

OXID eShop contains a session fixation vulnerability where attackers can use a specially crafted URL to pre-establish a session ID that will be inherited by an authenticated admin user. Once the admin user logs in with this fixed session ID, the attacker can hijack the admin session and gain unauthorized access to the admin panel.

MitigationRegenerate session IDs upon user authentication (login) and implement secure session cookie attributes (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite). Additionally, invalidate previous session IDs on login to prevent session fixation attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EshopApplication
Affected:>= 4.9.0, <= 4.10.0>= 5.2.0, <= 5.3.0>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.6>= 6.1.0, < 6.1.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OXID eShop version
    Check the version file (e.g., /source/OxidEsales/Eshop/release.json or /source/Application/Model/Shop.php) or log into the admin panel and check the 'System' > 'Info' section for the version number
    Affected if The installed version falls within 4.9.0-4.10.0, 5.2.0-5.3.0, 6.0.0-6.0.5, or 6.1.0-6.1.4
  2. Verify session ID regeneration on login
    Examine the authentication source code (typically in /source/Application/Controller/Admin/LoginController.php or similar) and look for session_regenerate_id() or session_create_id() calls within the login handling function
    Affected if The login handler does NOT call session_regenerate_id() or equivalent after successful authentication, meaning session IDs are not regenerated upon admin login
  3. Check session invalidation on login
    Search the authentication and session handling code for session_unset() or session_destroy() calls that should invalidate the previous session ID after successful login
    Affected if Previous session IDs are NOT invalidated after admin authentication, allowing a fixed session ID to persist after login
  4. Inspect session cookie configuration
    Check the session configuration file (usually config.inc.php or php.ini) for session.cookie_httponly, session.cookie_secure, and session.cookie_samesite settings
    Affected if Session cookies lack HttpOnly, Secure, or SameSite attributes, leaving them vulnerable to being accessed via JavaScript or transmitted over insecure connections

You are affected if your OXID eShop version is within the affected ranges AND the login process does not regenerate/invalidate session IDs upon admin authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.0.6 / 6.1.5 or later
Fixed in 6.0.66.1.5
Interim mitigation

Regenerate session IDs upon user authentication (login) and implement secure session cookie attributes (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite). Additionally, invalidate previous session IDs on login to prevent session fixation attacks.

Fix this in Eshop Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-17062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-17062 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data