Eda AgentApplication · Eracent

CVE-2019-17445

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-11-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.2.26 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Eracent EDA, EPA, EPM, EUA, FLW, and SUM Agent through 10.2.26. The agent executable, when installed for non-root operations (scanning), can be forced to copy files from the filesystem to other locations via Symbolic Link Following.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A symbolic link following vulnerability in Eracent agent software (versions through 10.2.26) allows an attacker with local access to manipulate the non-root scanning agent into copying files from arbitrary filesystem locations to other destinations. This file manipulation could enable privilege escalation or unauthorized access to sensitive data.

MitigationRestrict local access to trusted users only, implement strict file permissions on directories used by the agent, and monitor for suspicious symbolic link creation near agent operations. Upgrading to a patched version once available is recommended.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Eda AgentApplication
Affected:<= 10.2.26
Epa AgentApplication
Affected:<= 10.2.26
Epm AgentApplication
Affected:<= 10.2.26
Eua AgentApplication
Affected:<= 10.2.26
Flw AgentApplication
Affected:<= 10.2.26
Sum AgentApplication
Affected:<= 10.2.26

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Eracent agents
    Search the system for Eracent agent software components. Look for processes or services named Eda, Epa, Epm, Eua, Flw, or Sum, or check common software installation directories for Eracent products.
    Affected if Any Eracent agent software (Eda, Epa, Epm, Eua, Flw, or Sum) is found on the system
  2. Determine Eracent agent version
    Query the installed Eracent agent software for its version information using the software's native version command or check the binary/package version.
    Affected if The installed version is 10.2.26 or lower
  3. Locate agent working directories
    Identify directories the Eracent agent uses for scanning, temp file handling, or output operations. Check agent configuration files or process working directories.
    Affected if The agent uses world-writable or group-writable directories for file operations
  4. Inspect for suspicious symbolic links
    Examine the agent working directories for symbolic links pointing to sensitive system locations or unexpected destinations. Look for symlinks created by non-privileged users.
    Affected if Symbolic links exist in agent directories that point outside expected scanning targets, especially if created by non-root users
  5. Verify file permissions on agent directories
    Review permissions on directories used by the Eracent agent. Check if unauthorized users can create or modify files in these locations.
    Affected if Agent directories allow write access from non-privileged or untrusted user accounts

The environment is affected if any Eracent agent (Eda, Epa, Epm, Eua, Flw, or Sum) version 10.2.26 or lower is installed and the agent operates on directories accessible to untrusted local users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.2.26
Interim mitigation

Restrict local access to trusted users only, implement strict file permissions on directories used by the agent, and monitor for suspicious symbolic link creation near agent operations. Upgrading to a patched version once available is recommended.

Fix this in Eda Agent Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-17445 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-17445 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data