CVE-2019-17559
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere is a vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.3, 7.0.0 to 7.1.8, and 8.0.0 to 8.0.5 with a smuggling attack and scheme parsing. Upgrade to versions 7.1.9 and 8.0.6 or later versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Traffic Server contains an HTTP smuggling vulnerability related to scheme parsing. Attackers can exploit inconsistencies in how the proxy parses HTTP request schemes to bypass security controls, inject malicious requests, or access restricted resources. This affects the TS-4501 security fix area in the proxy processing pipeline.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, <= 6.2.3>= 7.0.0, <= 7.1.8>= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.5= 10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Apache Traffic Server is installedRun `traffic_server -V` or check via package manager (e.g., `dpkg -l | grep trafficserver` on Debian, `rpm -qa | grep trafficserver` on RHEL)Affected if Command returns a version number indicating Apache Traffic Server is present
-
Determine installed versionExtract the exact version number from the output of `traffic_server -V` or package query commandAffected if The returned version falls within any of these ranges: 6.0.0 to 6.2.3, 7.0.0 to 7.1.8, or 8.0.0 to 8.0.5 (inclusive)
-
Confirm proxy processing is enabledInspect the Traffic Server configuration file (records.config) and verify `proxy.config.http.enable` is set to `1` or check that the proxy port is configured in records.config under `proxy.config.http.server_ports`Affected if Proxy processing is enabled (value is 1 or a proxy port is configured)
-
Check for exposed proxy interfaceReview records.config for `proxy.config.http.insert_squid_x_forwarded_for` or similar proxy-related settings, and verify the proxy listener is bound to an accessible network interface (not localhost-only)Affected if The proxy is listening on a non-internal interface and accessible to potential attackers
You are affected if Apache Traffic Server is running with proxy enabled AND the installed version falls within 6.0.0-6.2.3, 7.0.0-7.1.8, or 8.0.0-8.0.5.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Apache Traffic Server to version 7.1.9, 8.0.6, or later to patch the vulnerability. For systems that cannot be immediately upgraded, implement additional request validation at upstream proxies and monitor for anomalous traffic patterns indicative of smuggling attempts.
Apache Traffic Server 7.1.9+ or 8.0.6+ (or latest 7.x/8.x stable release)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Apache Traffic Server version using: `traffic_server -V` or `ats -V`
- 2. For Debian systems, check the installed package version: `dpkg -l | grep trafficserver`
- 3. For Traffic Server 7.x (7.0.0 to 7.1.8): Upgrade to version 7.1.9 or later (e.g., 7.2.0, 7.3.0)
- 4. For Traffic Server 8.x (8.0.0 to 8.0.5): Upgrade to version 8.0.6 or later (e.g., 8.1.0, 8.2.0)
- 5. For Debian 10.0: Update package repositories and upgrade: `apt update && apt install trafficserver`
- 6. If using Apache Traffic Server from source: Download the fixed version from https://traffic.apache.org/downloads/
- 7. Rebuild and reinstall the new version following standard build procedures
- 8. After upgrade, verify the new version is running: `traffic_server -V`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-17559 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-17559 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data