CVE-2019-1818
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Infrastructure and Cisco Evolved Programmable Network (EPN) Manager software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to download and view files within the application that should be restricted. This vulnerability is due to improper sanitization of user-supplied input in HTTP request parameters that describe filenames. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using directory traversal techniques to submit a path to a desired file location. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view application files that may contain sensitive information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Infrastructure and Cisco Evolved Programmable Network (EPN) Manager allows authenticated remote attackers to access restricted files by submitting directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../) in HTTP request parameters that describe filenames. This could expose sensitive application files including configuration data, credentials, or other internal documents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.0.1< 3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco EPN Manager or Prime Infrastructure is installedCheck for the presence of installation directories (typically /opt/CSCOlumos or /opt/cpi) or look for processes named 'EPN Manager' or 'Prime Infrastructure' running on the system. On Linux, run: ps aux | grep -i 'cisco\|epn\|prime' or check /opt for CSCO or pi directories.Affected if The product is present on the system and matches one of the affected product lines.
-
Determine the installed version of Cisco EPN ManagerCheck the version by examining the file /opt/CSCOlumos/version.txt or by accessing the web login page which often displays the version. You can also check via CLI if available: show version or check the About page in the web interface.Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.0.1.
-
Determine the installed version of Cisco Prime InfrastructureCheck the version by examining the file /opt/cpi/Version.xml or access the web login page which typically displays the version in the footer. You can also check via CLI: show version or admin:showVersion.Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.4.
-
Verify if the web-based management interface is enabled and accessibleCheck if the web service is running by examining listening ports (typically 443, 8443, or 8080). Run: netstat -tlnp | grep -E '443\|8443\|8080' or check if the service process is running.Affected if The web management interface is active and reachable on the network.
-
Review HTTP access logs for directory traversal patternsExamine web server access logs (typically in /opt/CSCOlumos/logs or /opt/cpi/logs) for unusual request patterns containing '../' sequences in parameters, such as: grep -r '\.\./' /opt/*/logs/*access* or search for '..%2F' URL-encoded traversal patterns.Affected if Logs show directory traversal attempts targeting sensitive file paths.
You are affected if either Cisco EPN Manager below version 3.0.1 or Cisco Prime Infrastructure below version 3.4 is installed and its web-based management interface is accessible to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data3.0.13.4
Apply the vendor security updates/patches released by Cisco for this vulnerability. Until patched, restrict network access to the management interface to trusted personnel only and implement web application firewall rules to detect and block path traversal patterns in HTTP requests.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1818 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1818 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data