CVE-2019-18191
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA privilege escalation vulnerability in the Trend Micro Deep Security as a Service Quick Setup cloud formation template could allow an authenticated entity with certain unrestricted AWS execution privileges to escalate to full privileges within the target AWS account.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Trend Micro Deep Security as a Service Quick Setup CloudFormation template contains overly permissive IAM role configurations that allow an authenticated AWS entity with limited execution privileges to escalate to full administrative privileges within the target AWS account. The template grants excessive IAM permissions that can be exploited to gain additional rights.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Deep Security CloudFormation deploymentsIn the AWS CloudFormation console, review stacks with names containing 'DeepSecurity', 'TrendMicro', or similar. Alternatively, run: aws cloudformation list-stacks --stack-status-filter CREATE_COMPLETE UPDATE_COMPLETE and grep for Deep Security related stack names.Affected if A CloudFormation stack named 'Deep Security' or 'Trend Micro' with Quick Setup template exists in the account
-
Locate IAM roles created by Deep Security templateRun: aws iam list-roles --query 'Roles[?contains(RoleName, `DeepSecurity`) || contains(RoleName, `TrendMicro`) || contains(RoleName, `DS`)]' to find IAM roles created during Deep Security deployment. Note the role names and ARNs.Affected if IAM roles with names related to Deep Security exist in the account
-
Examine IAM role trust relationshipsRun: aws iam get-role --role-name [ROLE_NAME] --query 'Role.AssumeRolePolicyDocument' for each Deep Security related role. Review which AWS entities are allowed to assume these roles.Affected if The trust policy allows broader set of principals than expected (such as any authenticated user or cross-account access)
-
Review IAM role permissions policiesRun: aws iam list-role-policies --role-name [ROLE_NAME] and aws iam list-attached-role-policies --role-name [ROLE_NAME] to identify all managed and inline policies. Then run: aws iam get-role-policy --role-name [ROLE_NAME] --policy-name [POLICY_NAME] for inline policies, or: aws iam get-policy --policy-arn [ARN] for managed policies to inspect the actual permissions granted.Affected if Policies grant overly broad IAM permissions such as iam:*Role*, iam:AttachUserPolicy, or iam:PassRole to any resource
-
Check for privilege escalation pathsReview the IAM permissions attached to the Deep Security roles for actions that could enable privilege escalation, such as: iam:CreateUser, iam:AttachUserPolicy, iam:PutUserPolicy, iam:CreateAccessKey, iam:PassRole combined with other IAM write actions, or any permission allowing modification of other IAM entities.Affected if The IAM role has permissions that allow an attacker with limited execution privileges to gain additional rights beyond what they were granted
A user is affected if they have deployed the Trend Micro Deep Security as a Service Quick Setup CloudFormation template and the resulting IAM roles contain overly broad permissions that could be exploited for privilege escalation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict IAM role permissions in the CloudFormation template to follow least-privilege principles, removing any overly broad permissions that could enable privilege escalation. Audit existing deployments and rotate credentials.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation5.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-18191 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-18191 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data