CVE-2019-18316
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SPPA-T3000 Application Server (All versions < Service Pack R8.2 SP2). An attacker with network access to the Application Server could gain remote code execution by sending specifically crafted packets to 1099/tcp. Please note that an attacker needs to have network access to the Application Server in order to exploit this vulnerability. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceRemote code execution vulnerability in Siemens SPPA-T3000 Application Server affecting versions prior to Service Pack R8.2 SP2. An attacker with network access to port 1099/tcp (Java RMI registry) can send specially crafted packets to achieve arbitrary code execution on the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< r8.2= r8.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SPPA-T3000 Application Server versionLocate the installed version through system information, About dialog, or version configuration files typically found in the application installation directoryAffected if Installed version is earlier than r8.2 or exactly equals r8.2
-
Verify port 1099/tcp listener statusRun netstat or a port scanning tool to determine if port 1099 is listening on the server (e.g., netstat -an | grep 1099 or nmap -p 1099 target)Affected if Port 1099/tcp is open and listening
-
Confirm Java RMI service is activeCheck if the Java RMI Registry service is running on the system, typically visible in process lists or service management toolsAffected if Java RMI Registry service is running and bound to port 1099
-
Assess network accessibility of port 1099Determine if port 1099 is reachable from untrusted network segments by reviewing firewall rules, ACLs, or performing external port scans from outside the trusted networkAffected if Port 1099 is accessible from network segments that contain untrusted or attacker-controlled systems
The environment is affected if the SPPA-T3000 Application Server version is r8.2 or earlier AND port 1099/tcp (Java RMI) is exposed to an attacker on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Service Pack R8.2 SP2 or later to remediate. As a compensating control, restrict network access to port 1099/tcp and implement network segmentation to limit exposure of the Application Server.
Service Pack R8.2 SP2 (or later)
- Verify current installed version of SPPA-T3000 Application Server by checking system documentation or version information
- Confirm network accessibility of port 1099/tcp and restrict access if possible as an interim measure
- Obtain the Service Pack R8.2 SP2 update from Siemens via official channels (cert-portal.siemens.com or Siemens customer support)
- Review release notes and upgrade documentation for SPPA-T3000 Application Server
- Execute the upgrade process following Siemens-provided installation instructions
- After upgrade, verify the application server is running correctly and the vulnerability is resolved
- Validate that network access controls remain in place for port 1099/tcp
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-18316 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-18316 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data