CVE-2019-18339
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SiNVR/SiVMS Video Server (All versions < V5.0.0). The HTTP service (default port 5401/tcp) of the SiVMS/SiNVR Video Server contains an authentication bypass vulnerability, even when properly configured with enforced authentication. A remote attacker with network access to the Video Server could exploit this vulnerability to read the SiVMS/SiNVR users database, including the passwords of all users in obfuscated cleartext.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the HTTP service (port 5401/tcp) of SiNVR/SiVMS Video Server for all versions prior to V5.0.0. Despite proper authentication configuration, remote attackers can bypass authentication mechanisms to access the user database containing passwords stored in obfuscated cleartext.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SiNVR/SiVMS installationCheck for SiNVR or SiVMS Video Server software on the system by reviewing installed programs, services, or process listings. Look for service names containing 'SiNVR' or 'SiVMS'.Affected if SiNVR 3 Central Control Server or SiNVR 3 Video Server software is present on the system
-
Verify HTTP service on port 5401/tcpRun 'netstat -an | findstr 5401' or 'ss -tlnp | grep 5401' to check if the HTTP service is listening on port 5401/tcp. Confirm local binding status.Affected if Port 5401/tcp is open and listening, indicating the vulnerable HTTP service is active
-
Determine installed versionReview installation directories, service properties, or product documentation to identify the exact version of SiNVR/SiVMS Video Server. Compare against V5.0.0.Affected if The installed version is any version prior to V5.0.0, or the version cannot be determined but the software is present
-
Check network exposure of the HTTP serviceReview firewall rules, network configuration, or binding settings to determine if port 5401/tcp is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.Affected if Port 5401/tcp is accessible from remote systems beyond the local host or trusted internal network
If SiNVR 3 Central Control Server or SiNVR 3 Video Server is installed with the HTTP service on port 5401/tcp accessible and the version is below V5.0.0, the environment is affected by this authentication bypass vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade SiNVR/SiVMS Video Server to version V5.0.0 or later to remediate the authentication bypass. After upgrading, verify user account integrity and consider password resets since the previous versions stored credentials in insecure obfuscated cleartext.
V5.0.0 or later
- Identify the current version of the SiVMS/SiNVR Video Server installation
- Back up all configuration files, the users database, and any existing recordings or data
- Upgrade the SiVMS/SiNVR Video Server to version 5.0.0 or later
- After upgrade, verify that the HTTP service on port 5401/tcp now requires proper authentication
- Confirm that the users database is no longer accessible without authentication
- Test that enforced authentication settings are functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-18339 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-18339 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data