Rsa Identity Governance And LifecycleApplication · Dell

CVE-2019-18572

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-12-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and RSA Via Lifecycle and Governance products prior to 7.1.1 P03 contain an Improper Authentication vulnerability. A Java JMX agent running on the remote host is configured with plain text password authentication. An unauthenticated remote attacker can connect to the JMX agent and monitor and manage the Java application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle products contain a Java JMX agent configured with plain text password authentication, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to connect and fully manage the Java application due to improper authentication controls.

MitigationApply vendor patch 7.1.1 P03 or later to address the improper authentication vulnerability. If JMX is not required, consider disabling it or implementing proper authentication with encrypted credentials.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rsa Identity Governance And LifecycleApplication
Affected:= 7.0= 7.0.1= 7.0.2= 7.1.0= 7.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed version
    Check the product version through the administrative console or by querying the installed software package. This is typically visible in the product UI under About or System Information, or can be obtained via command line tools used for the installation.
    Affected if The installed version matches 7.0, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.1.0, or 7.1.1 exactly.
  2. Determine if JMX service is enabled
    Inspect the Java application server configuration files and running processes to identify whether the Java Management Extensions (JMX) agent is actively running. Look for JMX-related service configurations or port listeners commonly associated with JMX.
    Affected if JMX is enabled and listening on a network port accessible from remote systems.
  3. Verify JMX authentication configuration
    Examine the JMX configuration files for the authentication settings. Check whether the JMX connector is configured with authentication enabled and whether credentials are stored in plain text.
    Affected if JMX is configured with authentication using plain text passwords, allowing remote connections without proper encrypted credential storage.
  4. Assess network accessibility of JMX port
    Determine if the JMX port is exposed to network-accessible interfaces rather than bound only to localhost. Review firewall rules and service binding configurations.
    Affected if The JMX service is bound to a publicly accessible network interface and accepts remote connections.

The environment is affected if the installed version is exactly 7.0, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.1.0, or 7.1.1 AND the JMX agent is enabled with plain text password authentication accessible from remote networks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patch 7.1.1 P03 or later to address the improper authentication vulnerability. If JMX is not required, consider disabling it or implementing proper authentication with encrypted credentials.

Fix this in Rsa Identity Governance And Lifecycle Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,780
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-18572 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-18572 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data