CVE-2019-18903
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Use After Free vulnerability in wicked of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15; openSUSE Leap 15.1, Factory allows remote attackers to cause DoS or potentially code execution. This issue affects: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 wicked versions prior to 0.6.60-2.18.1. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 wicked versions prior to 0.6.60-28.26.1. openSUSE Leap 15.1 wicked versions prior to 0.6.60-lp151.2.9.1. openSUSE Factory wicked versions prior to 0.6.62.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Use After Free (UAF) vulnerability exists in the wicked network management daemon on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server and openSUSE systems. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to cause denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code by exploiting improper memory management where memory is accessed after being freed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 15.1= 12= 15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed wicked versionRun 'rpm -q wicked' or 'zypper info wicked' to retrieve the installed package versionAffected if The version is 0.6.60-2.18.1 or earlier on SLES 12, 0.6.60-28.26.1 or earlier on SLES 15, or 0.6.60-lp151.2.9.1 or earlier on Leap 15.1
-
Confirm wicked daemon is activeRun 'systemctl is-active wickedd' or 'systemctl status wicked' to check if the service is runningAffected if The service is active and the version from step 1 falls within the affected ranges
-
Verify package source repositoryRun 'rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME} %{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{VENDOR}\n" | grep wicked' to see which repository the package originated fromAffected if The package originates from a vendor repository but remains at an unpatched version within the affected ranges
You are affected if the wicked network management daemon is installed and running with a version at or below the threshold for your specific SUSE product (0.6.60-2.18.1 for SLES 12, 0.6.60-28.26.1 for SLES 15, or 0.6.60-lp151.2.9.1 for Leap 15.1).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches for the specific wicked versions (0.6.60-2.18.1 for SLES 12, 0.6.60-28.26.1 for SLES 15, 0.6.60-lp151.2.9.1 for Leap 15.1, or 0.6.62 for Factory). If patching is not immediately possible, restrict network access to the wicked service via firewall rules.
wicked 0.6.60-2.18.1 (SLE12), 0.6.60-28.26.1 (SLE15), 0.6.60-lp151.2.9.1 (Leap 15.1), or 0.6.62 (Factory)
- Identify the currently installed wicked version using: zypper info wicked or rpm -q wicked
- For SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12: Run zypper update wicked to upgrade to version 0.6.60-2.18.1 or later
- For SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15: Run zypper update wicked to upgrade to version 0.6.60-28.26.1 or later
- For openSUSE Leap 15.1: Run zypper update wicked to upgrade to version 0.6.60-lp151.2.9.1 or later
- For openSUSE Factory: Run zypper update wicked to upgrade to version 0.6.62 or later
- After upgrading, restart the wicked service using: systemctl restart wickedd or systemctl restart wicked
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed version using: rpm -q wicked
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-18903 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-18903 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data