Ios XrOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2019-1910

HIGH · 7.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-08-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.6.3 or later.
See remediation →
79/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the implementation of the Intermediate System–to–Intermediate System (IS–IS) routing protocol functionality in Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated attacker who is in the same IS–IS area to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to incorrect processing of crafted IS–IS link-state protocol data units (PDUs). An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted link-state PDU to an affected system to be processed. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause all routers within the IS–IS area to unexpectedly restart the IS–IS process, resulting in a DoS condition. This vulnerability affects Cisco devices if they are running a vulnerable release of Cisco IOS XR Software earlier than Release 6.6.3 and are configured with the IS–IS routing protocol. Cisco has confirmed that this vulnerability affects both Cisco IOS XR 32-bit Software and Cisco IOS XR 64-bit Software.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in the IS-IS routing protocol implementation in Cisco IOS XR Software allows an unauthenticated attacker in the same IS-IS area to send a crafted link-state PDU that causes all routers in the area to unexpectedly restart the IS-IS process, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade to Cisco IOS XR Software Release 6.6.3 or later, or implement IS-IS MD5 authentication to prevent processing of unauthenticated PDUs.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ios XrOperating system
Affected:< 6.6.3
Carrier Routing SystemApplication
Affected:= 7.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device and software version
    Execute 'show version' or access the device management interface to determine if the device runs Cisco IOS XR software or Cisco Carrier Routing System, and record the exact software version number.
    Affected if The device runs Cisco IOS XR with version lower than 6.6.3, or runs Cisco Carrier Routing System version 7.0.1.
  2. Verify IS-IS protocol is enabled
    Execute 'show isis protocol' or 'show isis adjacency' to check if the IS-IS routing protocol is configured and active on the device.
    Affected if IS-IS protocol is enabled and the device is participating in an IS-IS area.
  3. Check IS-IS process status
    Execute 'show isis process' or check process monitoring to determine if the IS-IS routing process is running.
    Affected if The IS-IS process is running and handling link-state PDUs.
  4. Verify IS-IS authentication configuration
    Execute 'show isis configuration' or review the IS-IS configuration to determine if MD5 authentication is configured for the IS-IS area or interface.
    Affected if MD5 authentication is NOT configured for IS-IS, meaning the device will process unauthenticated link-state PDUs.

A device is affected if it runs Cisco IOS XR version below 6.6.1 or exactly 7.0.1 on CRS, has IS-IS enabled, and does not have IS-IS MD5 authentication configured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.6.3 or later
Fixed in 6.6.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Cisco IOS XR Software Release 6.6.3 or later, or implement IS-IS MD5 authentication to prevent processing of unauthenticated PDUs.

Fix this in Ios Xr Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1910 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1910 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data