CVE-2019-1922
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Cisco SIP IP Phone Software for Cisco IP Phone 7800 Series and 8800 Series could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected phone. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of input Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by altering the SIP replies that are sent to the affected phone during the registration process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the phone to reboot and not complete the registration process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability exists in Cisco SIP IP Phone Software for the 7800 and 8800 series phones. It stems from insufficient validation of input Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) packets. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit it by altering SIP replies sent to the phone during the registration process, causing the phone to reboot repeatedly and fail to complete registration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 11.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)all versionsall versionsall versionsall versions= 11.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)= 11.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify phone model and firmware versionAccess the phone's web interface (navigate to the phone's IP address in a browser) and check the Administration or Device section for the firmware version. Alternatively, press Settings on the phone display and look for Status or Phone Information to find the firmware version.Affected if The phone model is 7811, 7821, 7841, 7861, 8811, 8841, 7832, or 8832, and the firmware version is 11.5(1), 12.5(1), or any version for models listed as 'all versions'.
-
Check for repeated reboots or registration failuresObserve the phone display for continuous reboot cycles or error messages indicating registration failure. Check the phone's web interface Status or Call Status section for registration errors.Affected if The phone is repeatedly rebooting without successfully registering to the SIP call server, or displays persistent registration failures.
-
Verify SIP registration statusCheck the phone's web interface under SIP Settings or Call Control settings to confirm the registration status. Look for indicators showing whether the phone is registered or failing to register.Affected if The phone shows as unregistered or unable to complete registration despite network connectivity.
-
Review phone network exposureExamine network configuration to determine if the phone is accessible from untrusted networks. Check if the SIP port (UDP/TCP 5060) on the phone is exposed to networks beyond the internal voice VLAN.Affected if The phone's SIP interface is reachable from untrusted or outside networks, allowing unauthenticated SIP traffic to reach the device.
You are affected if you have any of the listed phone models (7800 or 8800 series) running the specified firmware versions (or any version for models listed as 'all versions') AND the phone is experiencing repeated reboots or registration failures consistent with the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied software update/patch from Cisco. Until patches are available, consider network segmentation to restrict unauthorized SIP traffic to phone endpoints, and monitor for unusual registration failures indicating exploitation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1922 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1922 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data