CVE-2019-19662
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Create/Delete Accounts functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can Create and Delete accounts via RAPR/TriggerServerFunction.html.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1's Web File Manager. The Create/Delete Accounts functionality at RAPR/TriggerServerFunction.html lacks proper CSRF protection, allowing an attacker to trick an authenticated administrator into unknowingly creating or deleting user accounts by embedding malicious requests in websites or emails.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.2.9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Rumpus FTP Server installationCheck if Maxum Rumpus FTP Server is installed on the system. Look for the application in installed programs, running services, or attempt to access the web interface (typically on port 8080 or 2000 for Web File Manager).Affected if Rumpus FTP Server is not installed on the system
-
Identify installed versionDetermine the exact version of Rumpus FTP Server by checking the application (Help menu, About dialog), the server banner, or the web interface. The affected version is specifically 8.2.9.1.Affected if The installed version is NOT 8.2.9.1 (versions before or after this specific release are not affected by this CVE)
-
Verify Web File Manager is accessibleAttempt to access the Web File Manager interface through a web browser. The vulnerability exists in the web-based interface at RAPR/TriggerServerFunction.html.Affected if The Web File Manager interface is not accessible or not enabled
Only if running exactly version 8.2.9.1 of Rumpus FTP Server with the Web File Manager interface enabled and accessible is the system vulnerable to the CSRF flaw in account creation/deletion.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations in the Web File Manager, and validate the Referer or Origin header on the server side to ensure requests originate from legitimate sources.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-19662 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-19662 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data