SerpicoApplication · Serpico Project

CVE-2019-19857

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-01-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Serpico (aka SimplE RePort wrIting and CollaboratiOn tool) 1.3.0. An admin can change their password without providing the current password, by using interfaces outside the Change Password screen. Thus, requiring the admin to enter an Old Password value on the Change Password screen does not enhance security. This is problematic in conjunction with XSS.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Serpico 1.3.0 contains a password change authentication bypass where the admin password change function on the main Change Password screen requires the old password for security, but alternative interfaces/endpoints allow password changes without verifying the current password. This allows any authenticated user to change the admin password without knowing the original, which is especially dangerous when combined with XSS vulnerabilities that could provide authentication.

MitigationAudit and secure all password change functionality in the application to consistently require current password verification regardless of which interface or API endpoint is used. Implement uniform authorization checks across all password modification paths.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SerpicoApplication
Affected:= 1.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Serpico version
    Locate the installed version of Serpico by checking the application version file, about page, or header response in the web interface. Compare the version number to the affected range.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.3.0
  2. Locate password change functionality
    Navigate to the main Change Password screen in the Serpico web interface. Identify all password change interfaces including web forms, API endpoints, or alternate routes.
    Affected if Password change functionality exists and is accessible to authenticated users
  3. Enumerate password change endpoints
    Review application routing, API documentation, or intercept HTTP requests to identify all endpoints that handle password modifications. Note any differences in how each endpoint validates the request.
    Affected if Multiple endpoints or interfaces exist for password changes beyond the main screen
  4. Verify password verification consistency
    Test or examine the code for each password change endpoint to determine whether each requires the current password for verification. Compare the authentication behavior across all identified endpoints.
    Affected if Some endpoints allow password changes without requiring the old password while others do require it

A user is affected if they have Serpico version 1.3.0 installed and the application contains alternative password change endpoints that bypass current password verification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Audit and secure all password change functionality in the application to consistently require current password verification regardless of which interface or API endpoint is used. Implement uniform authorization checks across all password modification paths.

Fix this in Serpico Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-19857 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-19857 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data