CVE-2019-2010
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn phNxpNciHal_process_ext_rsp of phNxpNciHal_ext.cc, there is a possible out-of-bound write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-7.0 Android-7.1.1 Android-7.1.2 Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9Android ID: A-118152591
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA missing bounds check in the phNxpNciHal_process_ext_rsp function within the NFC Controller Interface (NCI) vendor extension handler (phNxpNciHal_ext.cc) allows an out-of-bounds write. This memory corruption vulnerability in the NFC HAL can be exploited locally to escalate privileges without requiring additional execution privileges or user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 7.1.1= 7.1.2= 8.0= 8.1= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android OS versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shellAffected if The displayed version matches 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0, 8.1, or 9.0
-
Verify NFC hardware is presentCheck for NFC capability in Settings > Connected devices > NFC, or run 'getprop ro.hardware.nfc' via ADB shellAffected if NFC hardware is reported as present on the device
-
Confirm NFC is enabledCheck that NFC is turned on in Settings > Connected devices > NFC, or check the secure setting 'nfc_on' via 'settings get secure nfc_on' via ADBAffected if NFC is currently enabled on the device
-
Identify NFC HAL vendor implementationCheck for the NXP NFC HAL library on the system, typically found in /vendor/lib/hw/ or /system/lib/hw/ directories containing 'nfc' and 'nxp' in the filenameAffected if The device uses an NXP-based NFC HAL implementation (phNxpNciHal)
-
Check firmware version for NFC controllerUse an NFC debugging app or check NFC service logs via 'logcat -d | grep -i nci' to identify the NFC controller firmware versionAffected if The NFC controller firmware is an unpatched version from the affected Android release timeframe
A device is affected if it runs Android 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0, 8.1, or 9.0, has NFC hardware present and enabled, and uses an NXP NFC HAL implementation with the vulnerable phNxpNciHal_process_ext_rsp function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Android security patch level that includes the fix for A-118152591, or obtain a vendor-specific patch from the NFC chipset provider (NXP) that adds proper bounds validation before writing to the response buffer.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-2010 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-2010 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data