CVE-2019-20785
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 8.0 and 8.1 software for the DTAG carrier. RILD in the radio layer uses an uninitialized variable. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-180013 (January 2019).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceRILD (Radio Interface Layer Daemon) on LG mobile devices with Android 8.0 and 8.1 for the DTAG carrier uses an uninitialized variable, which can lead to unpredictable behavior or information disclosure when the radio layer processes certain operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if your device is an LG mobile phoneGo to Settings > About Phone > Manufacturer or check the device model number against LG product listingsAffected if Device is made by LG
-
Verify Android version is 8.0 or 8.1Go to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADBAffected if Android version equals 8.0 or 8.1
-
Confirm the device is configured for DTAG carrierCheck Settings > About Phone > Carrier or SIM status for 'DTAG', 'Deutsche Telekom', or 'T-Mobile' branding; alternatively check the build fingerprint or carrier ID via 'getprop' commandAffected if Device is branded for or connected to DTAG (Deutsche Telekom) network
Your device is affected only if it is an LG phone running Android 8.0 or 8.1 and configured for the DTAG carrier, as the uninitialized variable in RILD only exists in that specific vendor/carrier combination.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor firmware update (LVE-SMP-180013) from LG for affected devices on Android 8.0/8.1 for DTAG carrier. Users should check for system updates or contact LG/DTAG support for the patched firmware.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-20785 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-20785 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data