TeeworldsApplication

CVE-2019-20787

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-04-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.7.4 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Teeworlds before 0.7.4 has an integer overflow when computing a tilemap size.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Teeworlds before version 0.7.4 contains an integer overflow vulnerability when calculating tilemap dimensions. This occurs when arithmetic operations during tilemap size computation produce values exceeding the maximum representable value for the data type, causing wraparound and potentially leading to heap buffer overflows or memory corruption when the game allocates or accesses tilemap data.

MitigationUpgrade to Teeworlds version 0.7.4 or later, which contains the fix for this integer overflow vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TeeworldsApplication
Affected:< 0.7.4
LeapOperating system
Affected:= 15.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Teeworlds installation
    Run 'teeworlds --version' in a terminal or check the installed package via the system package manager (e.g., 'rpm -q teeworlds' on openSUSE or 'dpkg -l teeworlds' on Debian-based systems)
    Affected if Teeworlds is installed on the system
  2. Determine the installed Teeworlds version
    Examine the version string returned by 'teeworlds --version' or the package query command. Note the full version number (e.g., 0.7.3, 0.7.2, 0.6.5)
    Affected if A version number is returned that is lower than 0.7.4
  3. Compare version against the vulnerability threshold
    Compare the installed version to the affected range: any version before 0.7.4 is vulnerable. For example, 0.7.3, 0.7.2, 0.7.1, 0.7.0, 0.6.x, and earlier releases are all affected
    Affected if The installed version is less than 0.7.4 (e.g., 0.7.3 or earlier)
  4. Check the operating system version if using openSUSE
    If Teeworlds was installed via the system package manager on openSUSE Leap 15.1, verify the OS version using 'cat /etc/os-release' or 'hostnamectl'
    Affected if Running openSUSE Leap 15.1 with Teeworlds installed from the distribution packages

A system is affected if it runs any version of Teeworlds earlier than 0.7.4, particularly on openSUSE Leap 15.1 where the packaged version is vulnerable.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.7.4 or later
Fixed in 0.7.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Teeworlds version 0.7.4 or later, which contains the fix for this integer overflow vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

Teeworlds 0.7.4 or later

  1. 1. Check current Teeworlds version (typically via --version flag or about dialog in client)
  2. 2. Download Teeworlds 0.7.4 or later from the official website (www.teeworlds.com) or your distribution's package manager
  3. 3. Back up any existing game data/configurations if desired
  4. 4. Install the updated version (0.7.4 or later) using your package manager or by running the downloaded installer
  5. 5. Restart the Teeworlds client and server components
  6. 6. Verify the new version is running (should show 0.7.4 or higher)
Caveat Minor - ensure server and clients are version-compatible for network play; 0.7.4 clients can connect to 0.7.4 servers

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Teeworlds Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-20787 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-20787 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data