CVE-2019-2239
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSanity checks are missing in layout which can lead to SUI Corruption or can lead to Denial of Service in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8996AU, QCS404, QCS605, Qualcomm 215, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 439 / SD 429, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 625, SD 632, SD 636, SD 650/52, SD 675, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 730, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845 / SD 850, SD 8CX, SDA660, SDM439, SDM630, SDM660, SDX20, SDX24, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, SXR1130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing sanity checks in the layout processing component of Qualcomm Snapdragon chips can allow an attacker to cause System UI corruption or trigger a denial of service condition. The vulnerability exists in the layout handling code where improper validation of input data or parameters can lead to memory corruption or system instability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the chipset modelCheck /proc/cpuinfo or /sys/devices/system/cpu/ for Qualcomm chip identifiers such as Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, or Msm8996auAffected if The device uses any of the listed chipset models (Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, or Msm8996au)
-
Check firmware versionQuery the baseband or radio firmware version via AT command (AT+CGMR) or through /proc/version, /proc/cpuinfo, or manufacturer-specific diagnostic toolsAffected if The firmware version corresponds to any version of the affected chipsets listed - all versions of these products are vulnerable
-
Verify layout processing component is activeMonitor for System UI (com.android.systemui) crashes or anomalies in logcat (adb logcat) or bug reports, which indicate the layout processing component is being exercisedAffected if System UI crashes or rendering anomalies occur, suggesting the layout handling code path is active and potentially exploitable
-
Check for security patch levelCheck the Android security patch level via settings (Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level) or via 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' commandAffected if The security patch level is earlier than the date when this CVE was addressed (typically the October 2019 Android Security Patch or later)
The device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipset models (Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, or Msm8996au) and has not received vendor firmware updates addressing this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied firmware/driver update from Qualcomm. This is a platform-level fix requiring OEM firmware updates for affected devices. Users should monitor for and apply security patches from their device manufacturers.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-2239 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-2239 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data