CVE-2019-2303
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSNDCP module may access array out side its boundary when it receives malformed XID message. in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8939, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8976, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS605, QM215, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, SXR1130, SXR2130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the SNDCP (Subnetwork Dependent Convergence Protocol) module where processing a malformed XID (Exchange Identification) message causes out-of-bounds array access. This memory corruption in the baseband processor firmware could allow remote code execution with no authentication required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify baseband processor chipset modelCheck device documentation, FCC ID filings, or use AT commands (e.g., AT+CGMM or AT+QCFG="nw" on Qualcomm modems) to query the baseband processor modelAffected if The chipset model matches one of: Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Mdm9150, Mdm9205, or Mdm9206
-
Confirm SNDCP module is present and activeVerify the device uses GPRS/EDGE or 3G data services which rely on the SNDCP layer. This is typically handled internally by baseband firmware and not directly exposed to the host OSAffected if The device supports packet-switched data services over GSM/UMTS networks (SNDCP is used for IP packet encapsulation in 2G/3G) and uses an affected chipset
-
Check baseband firmware versionQuery the baseband firmware version using vendor-specific AT commands (e.g., AT+CGMR, ATI, or manufacturer-specific commands like AT+QVER="modem")Affected if The firmware version cannot be patched to a vendor-supplied update - note that ALL versions of the listed chipsets are affected per the advisory, so any installed version indicates exposure
-
Verify XID message processing is enabledXID negotiation occurs during GPRS/EDGE attach and PDP context activation. This is a standard protocol function that cannot be disabled in normal baseband operationAffected if The device performs GPRS/EDGE network attachment or activates PDP contexts (standard mobile data functions) - this is required for the vulnerability trigger
If your device contains any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8096au, Mdm9150, Mdm9205, Mdm9206, or Apq8098) and uses standard mobile data services, you are affected since all firmware versions are vulnerable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates from Qualcomm and downstream device manufacturers. This is a firmware-level issue requiring patches to the baseband processor code; network-level mitigations for malformed XID messages may provide temporary protection until firmware updates are available.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,320.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-2303 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-2303 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data