CVE-2019-25210
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) Helm through 3.13.3. It displays values of secrets when the --dry-run flag is used. This is a security concern in some use cases, such as a --dry-run call by a CI/CD tool. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this behavior was introduced intentionally, and cannot be removed without breaking backwards compatibility (some users may be relying on these values). Also, it is not the Helm Project's responsibility if a user decides to use --dry-run within a CI/CD environment whose output is visible to unauthorized persons.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHelm's --dry-run flag intentionally outputs all values including secrets to stdout. This behavior can expose sensitive information when used in CI/CD pipelines or other environments where output may be visible to unauthorized parties, representing a confidentiality breach with CVSS 6.5.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Helm installation and versionRun 'helm version' to see if Helm is installed. Since this affects all versions, note the version for reference.Affected if Helm is installed - this is a design issue affecting all versions
-
Find CI/CD pipeline configurations using --dry-runSearch for '--dry-run' in YAML files in common CI/CD directories: .github/workflows/, .gitlab-ci.yml, Jenkinsfiles, .travis.yml, azure-pipelines.yml, or similar. Use grep -r '--dry-run' /path/to/pipelines/Affected if The flag is used in any CI/CD pipeline configuration files
-
Check for --dry-run in shell scripts or automationSearch for 'helm.*--dry-run' in shell scripts, Ansible playbooks, Terraform files, or other automation: grep -r 'helm.*--dry-run' /path/to/scripts/Affected if Helm --dry-run commands appear in any scripts or automation files
-
Assess output exposure riskReview pipeline logs, artifacts storage, and job output visibility settings. Check if pipelines are public, logs are exposed, or output is stored in accessible locations.Affected if The --dry-run output could be visible to unauthorized parties through logs, artifacts, or shared output locations
If Helm is installed and --dry-run is used in any environment where output may be logged, stored, or visible to unauthorized users, the environment is affected by this information disclosure vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedAvoid using helm --dry-run in CI/CD pipelines or environments with exposed output. Use alternative approaches such as helm template for local validation or ensure dry-run output is never visible to unauthorized personnel.
- This is a known limitation with no fix available. The Helm project has explicitly stated they will not change this behavior as it would break backwards compatibility.
- If using Helm in CI/CD pipelines, ensure the pipeline output is not visible to unauthorized persons.
- Consider using Helm's --dry-run in isolated, secure environments only.
- Review your CI/CD pipeline permissions and visibility settings to prevent unauthorized access to Helm output.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-25210 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-25210 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data