CVE-2019-25361
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAyukov NFTP client 1.71 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the SYST command handling that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. Attackers can send a specially crafted SYST command with oversized payload to trigger a buffer overflow and execute a bind shell on port 5150.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Ayukov NFTP client version 1.71 in the SYST command handler allows remote attackers to send a specially crafted oversized payload that overflows a buffer, enabling arbitrary code execution including a bind shell on port 5150.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Ayukov NFTP client installationSearch for nftp.exe or the NFTP client executable in program directories, system PATH, or running processes using tasklist or Get-Process commandsAffected if The Ayukov NFTP client executable is found on the system
-
Confirm installed versionRun the client executable with a version flag (such as -v or --version) or inspect the file properties of the executableAffected if The installed version is 1.71
-
Determine if NFTP service is activeCheck for NFTP client process running and listening on network ports using netstat or by inspecting running servicesAffected if The NFTP client service is running and accessible to network connections
-
Scan for suspicious listener on port 5150Use netstat -an or similar network inspection tool to check for any process listening on TCP port 5150Affected if An unexpected or unauthorized process is bound to port 5150
A system is affected if the Ayukov NFTP client version 1.71 is installed and running, particularly if network access to the service is exposed and an unknown listener is observed on port 5150.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Ayukov NFTP client to a patched version if available; otherwise disable or remove the vulnerable client. Network-level filtering of malformed FTP commands may provide temporary mitigation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-25361 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-25361 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data