CVE-2019-25459
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWeb Ofisi Emlak V2 contains multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the endpoint that allow unauthenticated attackers to manipulate database queries through GET parameters. Attackers can inject SQL code into parameters like emlak_durumu, emlak_tipi, il, ilce, kelime, and semt to extract sensitive database information or perform time-based blind SQL injection attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWeb Ofisi Emlak V2 contains multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in an endpoint handling real estate property searches. Unauthenticated attackers can inject arbitrary SQL code through six GET parameters (emlak_durumu, emlak_tipi, il, ilce, kelime, semt), allowing extraction of sensitive database information or time-based blind SQL injection attacks. The critical CVSS score of 9.8 reflects the ease of exploitation and potential for complete database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Web Ofisi Emlak installationInspect the web application for signatures of Web Ofisi Emlak (check page footers, source code comments, HTML meta tags, or default branding that references 'Web Ofisi Emlak' or 'emlak').Affected if The application is confirmed to be Web Ofisi Emlak software.
-
Verify software versionLocate version information in the application (typically found in about pages, admin panels, or source code). Compare against the affected version 2.0.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.0.0.
-
Locate property listing endpointIdentify the property listing/search page URL path (commonly contains 'ilan', 'emlak', 'liste', or 'property' in the URL structure). This is where the vulnerable GET parameters are processed.Affected if A property listing endpoint exists and is accessible.
-
Confirm vulnerable GET parameters are processedTest that the parameters emlak_durumu, emlak_tipi, il, ilce, kelime, and semt are accepted by the listing endpoint (check by observing if the application uses these parameters in the request URL).Affected if The application processes one or more of these GET parameters without proper sanitization.
A user is affected if they are running Web Ofisi Emlak version 2.0.0 and have the property listing endpoint accessible with the vulnerable GET parameters exposed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace all dynamic SQL queries involving user input with parameterized queries/prepared statements, implementing strict input validation as an additional defense layer. Deploy a web application firewall as a temporary measure until code fixes are validated.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-25459 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-25459 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data