Advanced Threat DefenseApplication · Mcafee

CVE-2019-3650

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-11-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.8 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Information Disclosure vulnerability in McAfee Advanced Threat Defense (ATD prior to 4.8 allows remote authenticated attackers to gain access to the atduser credentials via carefully constructed GET request extracting insecurely information stored in the database.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

McAfee Advanced Threat Defense prior to version 4.8 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where remote authenticated attackers can exploit a GET request parameter to extract atduser credentials from the database. The credentials are stored insecurely, allowing authenticated users to retrieve them through carefully crafted database queries.

MitigationUpgrade McAfee Advanced Threat Defense to version 4.8 or later, which addresses the insecure credential storage. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict access to authenticated users and monitor for suspicious GET requests targeting credential endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Advanced Threat DefenseApplication
Affected:< 4.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed McAfee Advanced Threat Defense version
    Access the ATD administrative interface or check the system inventory for the ATD version number. This is typically visible in the product GUI under System > Information or in the about section.
    Affected if The installed version is any release prior to 4.8 (e.g., 4.7.x, 4.6.x, earlier versions).
  2. Verify whether remote authentication is enabled
    Review the ATD authentication configuration settings in the administrative console. Check if local users or remote directory users can authenticate to the ATD interface.
    Affected if Remote authenticated access to the ATD interface is permitted to users who could potentially exploit the GET request parameter flaw.
  3. Review access logs for suspicious GET requests targeting credential endpoints
    Examine the ATD server logs for unusual GET requests, particularly those containing database query patterns or requests to endpoints that could return user credential data.
    Affected if Any GET requests are observed that target credential retrieval endpoints or contain database query strings, especially from authenticated users.
  4. Inspect database configuration and credential storage settings
    Review the ATD database configuration files and storage mechanisms to confirm how atduser credentials are stored and whether they are encrypted or hashed.
    Affected if Credentials are found to be stored in an insecure manner (e.g., plaintext, weakly hashed, or reversible encoding).

A user is affected if McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is installed at any version prior to 4.8 and remote authenticated access is enabled, allowing attackers to exploit the GET request parameter to retrieve credentials from the database.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.8 or later
Fixed in 4.8
Interim mitigation

Upgrade McAfee Advanced Threat Defense to version 4.8 or later, which addresses the insecure credential storage. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict access to authenticated users and monitor for suspicious GET requests targeting credential endpoints.

Fix this in Advanced Threat Defense Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-3650 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-3650 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data