Avamar Data Migration Enabler Web InterfaceApplication · Dell

CVE-2019-3737

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-06-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Dell EMC Avamar ADMe Web Interface 1.0.50 and 1.0.51 are affected by an LFI vulnerability which may allow a malicious user to download arbitrary files from the affected system by sending a specially crafted request to the Web Interface application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in Dell EMC Avamar ADMe Web Interface versions 1.0.50 and 1.0.51 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the server by sending specially crafted requests to the web application.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Dell EMC Avamar ADMe Web Interface. If upgrade is not immediately possible, implement web application firewall rules to block directory traversal patterns in URL parameters and restrict web interface access to trusted IPs.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Avamar Data Migration Enabler Web InterfaceApplication
Affected:= 1.0.50= 1.0.51

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Dell Avamar Data Migration Enabler Web Interface is installed
    Locate and inspect the web application installation directory, or query the system for installed Dell Avamar software components
    Affected if The software is present on the system
  2. Identify the installed version of the web interface
    Check the version information of the Dell Avamar Data Migration Enabler Web Interface, typically found in application metadata, about page, or version file within the installation directory
    Affected if The version is exactly 1.0.50 or 1.0.51
  3. Verify the web interface is accessible and running
    Confirm the Avamar web service is running and the web interface port is listening, typically on HTTP/HTTPS ports
    Affected if The web interface is actively running and accessible
  4. Review web server logs for directory traversal attempts
    Examine the Avamar web interface access and error logs for suspicious URL patterns containing ../ or absolute file paths in request parameters
    Affected if Directory traversal patterns are present in recent web requests

You are affected if the Dell Avamar Data Migration Enabler Web Interface is installed with version 1.0.50 or 1.0.51 and the web interface is accessible, as these exact versions contain the LFI vulnerability that allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via crafted URL requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Dell EMC Avamar ADMe Web Interface. If upgrade is not immediately possible, implement web application firewall rules to block directory traversal patterns in URL parameters and restrict web interface access to trusted IPs.

Fix this in Avamar Data Migration Enabler Web Interface Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-3737 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-3737 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data