Routing ReleaseApplication · Cloudfoundry

CVE-2019-3789

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-04-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.188.0 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cloud Foundry Routing Release, all versions prior to 0.188.0, contains a vulnerability that can hijack the traffic to route services hosted outside the platform. A user with space developer permissions can create a private domain that shadows the external domain of the route service, and map that route to an app. When the gorouter receives traffic destined for the external route service, this traffic will instead be directed to the internal app using the shadow route.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A routing shadowing vulnerability in Cloud Foundry's gorouter allows a space developer to create a private domain that shadows external route service domains. When the gorouter receives traffic for the external service, it redirects to the attacker's internal application instead, enabling traffic hijacking.

MitigationUpgrade Cloud Foundry Routing Release to version 0.188.0 or later, and audit/revoke unnecessary space developer permissions to prevent domain shadowing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Routing ReleaseApplication
Affected:< 0.188.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check the Cloud Foundry Routing Release version
    Query the BOSH deployment for the gorouter release version using `bosh deployments` and `bosh vms -d cf-routing`, or check the stemcell manifest for the routing-release version
    Affected if The installed routing release version is below 0.188.0
  2. Identify space developer role assignments
    Use `cf org-users <org_name>` and `cf space-users <org> <space>` to list users with Space Developer role, or query the UAA API for role assignments
    Affected if Any user possesses Space Developer role in any space within an org that contains the affected gorouter
  3. Enumerate private domains in the foundation
    Run `cf domains` to list all domains, noting which are marked as 'private' or internal. Cross-reference with known external route service domains
    Affected if Private domains exist that share names with external route service domains (e.g., matching the hostname of SaaS or external service routes)
  4. Review gorouter route table for shadowed routes
    Inspect the gorouter's routing table via its debug endpoint (if exposed) or check route configuration in the Cloud Foundry database (ccdb.routes table) for route conflicts
    Affected if Routes exist where an internal private domain matches an external service domain, causing the gorouter to route to an internal app instead of the external service

You are affected if the Routing Release is below 0.188.0 AND any Space Developer can create private domains that shadow external route service domains.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.188.0 or later
Fixed in 0.188.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Cloud Foundry Routing Release to version 0.188.0 or later, and audit/revoke unnecessary space developer permissions to prevent domain shadowing.

Fix this in Routing Release Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-3789 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-3789 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data