CVE-2019-3816
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenwsman, versions up to and including 2.6.9, are vulnerable to arbitrary file disclosure because the working directory of openwsmand daemon was set to root directory. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted HTTP request to openwsman server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOpenwsman daemon versions up to 2.6.9 run with their working directory set to the root directory (/), enabling path traversal attacks. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send HTTP requests with '../' sequences to read arbitrary files on the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 7.0= 8.1= 8.2= 8.4= 7.0= 7.6= 8.2= 8.4= 7.6= 7.6= 8.2= 8.4= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if openwsman is installedRun 'rpm -qa | grep openwsman' or 'dpkg -l | grep openwsman' to list installed openwsman packagesAffected if openwsman package is installed and version is 2.6.9 or lower, or version matches the affected RHEL ranges (7.0, 7.6, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.4)
-
Verify openwsman service is runningRun 'systemctl status openwsman' or 'service openwsman status' to check if the daemon is active and listeningAffected if the openwsman daemon service is running and listening on a network port (default port 5985/5986)
-
Check service working directory configurationInspect the openwsman service unit file at /etc/systemd/system/openwsman.service.d/ or /lib/systemd/system/openwsman.service to see if 'WorkingDirectory' is set to '/' (root)Affected if WorkingDirectory is set to '/' or is unset (defaults to root), which allows path traversal to succeed
-
Test for path traversal vulnerabilitySend an HTTP request with '../' sequences to the openwsman endpoint, for example: 'curl http://localhost:5985/../../../etc/passwd' or similar path traversal patternAffected if the request successfully returns content from files outside the intended openwsman directory
You are affected if openwsman is installed with version 2.6.9 or lower, the daemon is running with working directory set to root (/), and the service is network-accessible enabling unauthenticated path traversal attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataChange the openwsmand daemon's working directory to a non-root location (e.g., /var/lib/openwsman) in the service configuration, and apply path sanitization to prevent directory traversal in HTTP request handling.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-3816 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-3816 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data